Amanda H. Kerbrat
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- General Health Professions
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Katherine Anne ComtoisDavid C. AtkinsSamantha A. ChalkerRichard K. RiesChristopher R. DeCouJustin C. BakerPeter M. GutierrezDavid A. Jobes
- Topics
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (17 papers)Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (7 papers)Mental Health Treatment and Access (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussiaCanada
In The Last Decade
Amanda H. Kerbrat
21 papers receiving 368 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Clinical Psychology 342
- Social Psychology 173
- Psychiatry and Mental health 62
- General Health Professions 37
- Applied Psychology 37
Countries citing papers authored by Amanda H. Kerbrat
This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda H. Kerbrat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda H. Kerbrat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda H. Kerbrat more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda H. Kerbrat
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda H. Kerbrat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda H. Kerbrat. The network helps show where Amanda H. Kerbrat may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda H. Kerbrat
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda H. Kerbrat. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda H. Kerbrat based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda H. Kerbrat. Amanda H. Kerbrat is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | Identifying opportunities for informatics-supported suicide prevention: the case of Caring Contacts. | 3 |
| 8 | 96 | |
| 9 | 26 | |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | 77 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 21 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 27 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About Amanda H. Kerbrat
Amanda H. Kerbrat is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 385 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (17 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (7 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (342 citations), Social Psychology (173 citations) and Applied Psychology (37 citations). Amanda H. Kerbrat has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Katherine Anne Comtois, David C. Atkins, Samantha A. Chalker, Richard K. Ries, Christopher R. DeCou, Justin C. Baker, Peter M. Gutierrez, David A. Jobes, David Huh and Melanie S. Harned. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Behaviour Research and Therapy and Journal of Affective Disorders.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.