Amanda Elliott
About
In The Last Decade
Amanda Elliott
4 papers receiving 701 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Sociology and Political Science 519
- General Health Professions 404
- Clinical Psychology 160
- Health 137
- Education 107
Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Elliott
This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Elliott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Elliott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Elliott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Elliott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Elliott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Elliott. The network helps show where Amanda Elliott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda Elliott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda Elliott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda Elliott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda Elliott. Amanda Elliott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 89 | |
| 3 | 76 | |
| 4 | The Effects of Neighborhood Disadvantage on Adolescent Development breakdown → | 608 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.