Amanda Bates

756 total citations
26 papers, 296 citations indexed

About

Amanda Bates is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation. According to data from OpenAlex, Amanda Bates has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 296 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in General Health Professions, 6 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 6 papers in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation. Recurrent topics in Amanda Bates's work include Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (6 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers). Amanda Bates is often cited by papers focused on Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (6 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers). Amanda Bates collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Amanda Bates's co-authors include Mary A. Nies, Arthur Au, J. Matthew Fields, Srikar Adhikari, Joshua Davis, Patrick Y. Wen, Terri S. Armstrong, Joohee Sul, Beverley Lloyd and Martin Taphoorn and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Lancet Oncology and Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise.

In The Last Decade

Amanda Bates

22 papers receiving 284 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Amanda Bates United Kingdom 9 56 49 48 42 40 26 296
Jean-Claude Becker United States 6 134 2.4× 42 0.9× 7 0.1× 31 0.7× 21 0.5× 8 505
Katherine Lloyd United Kingdom 10 22 0.4× 8 0.2× 7 0.1× 18 0.4× 9 0.2× 21 351
Ashly C. Westrick United States 12 72 1.3× 29 0.6× 6 0.1× 70 1.7× 5 0.1× 41 447
Liming Huang United States 12 36 0.6× 13 0.3× 2 0.0× 29 0.7× 16 0.4× 43 388
Art Zbrozek United States 12 34 0.6× 13 0.3× 3 0.1× 33 0.8× 10 0.3× 18 481
W Scaf-Klomp Netherlands 11 87 1.6× 49 1.0× 18 0.4× 53 1.3× 1 0.0× 12 384
Kaori Yagasaki Japan 13 13 0.2× 4 0.1× 10 0.2× 29 0.7× 12 0.3× 37 396
Ethan Ritz United States 11 98 1.8× 6 0.1× 4 0.1× 18 0.4× 4 0.1× 46 364
Karl M. Kilgore United States 11 16 0.3× 56 1.1× 3 0.1× 16 0.4× 12 0.3× 33 441
F. J. Bradley Netherlands 4 11 0.2× 8 0.2× 6 0.1× 24 0.6× 28 0.7× 5 332

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Bates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Bates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Bates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Bates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Bates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Bates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Bates. The network helps show where Amanda Bates may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda Bates

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda Bates. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda Bates based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda Bates. Amanda Bates is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Stock, Nicola Marie, et al.. (2024). Assessing Appearance, Speech, and Hearing (dis)Satisfaction in Individuals with Cleft Lip and/or Palate: A Contribution to General Population Norms. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 62(7). 1201–1209.
2.
Bates, Amanda, et al.. (2024). Involving Experts by Experience in Craniofacial Research. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 62(11). 1975–1980. 1 indexed citations
3.
Baldwin, Jennifer, Juliana S Oliveira, Amanda Bates, et al.. (2023). Responsiveness of Patient-Reported and Device-Based Physical Activity Measures: Secondary Analysis of Four Randomized Trials. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 56(4). 663–672. 1 indexed citations
6.
Stephensen, David, et al.. (2020). Acceptability and Feasibility of an Isometric Resistance Exercise Program for Abdominal Cancer Surgery: An Embedded Qualitative Study. Cancer Control. 27(1). 1148386119–1148386119. 1 indexed citations
7.
Armstrong, Terri S., Linda Dirven, David Arons, et al.. (2020). Glioma patient-reported outcome assessment in clinical care and research: a Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology collaborative report. The Lancet Oncology. 21(2). e97–e103. 50 indexed citations
8.
Bates, Amanda, Rachel Forrester‐Jones, & Michelle McCarthy. (2019). Specialist hospital treatment and care as reported by children with intellectual disabilities and a cleft lip and/or palate, their parents and healthcare professionals. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. 33(2). 283–295. 6 indexed citations
9.
Rogers, James L., Alvina Acquaye, Elizabeth Vera, et al.. (2019). Provider-reported challenges and barriers to referring patients to neuro-oncology clinical trials: a report from the Society for Neuro-Oncology member survey. Neuro-Oncology Practice. 7(1). 38–51. 14 indexed citations
11.
Bates, Amanda, et al.. (2018). Development of a training programme for primary care mental health staff to support management of depression and anxiety in long-term conditions. Primary Health Care Research & Development. 20. e12–e12. 3 indexed citations
12.
Bates, Amanda, et al.. (2017). HOUT-15. BRAIN TUMOR PATIENT AND CAREGIVER SURVEY ON CLINICAL TRIALS: IDENTIFYING ATTITUDES AND BARRIERS TO PATIENT PARTICIPATION. Neuro-Oncology. 19(suppl_6). vi109–vi109. 9 indexed citations
13.
Ellaway, Rachel, et al.. (2014). Exploring the consequences of combining medical students with and without a background in biomedical sciences. Medical Education. 48(7). 674–686. 9 indexed citations
14.
Fagan, Kevin J., Katharine M. Irvine, Amanda Bates, et al.. (2013). Assessment of alcohol histories obtained from patients with liver disease: Opportunities to improve early intervention. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland).
15.
Fagan, Kevin J., Katharine M. Irvine, Sailesh Kumar, et al.. (2013). Assessment of alcohol histories obtained from patients with liver disease: opportunities to improve early intervention. Internal Medicine Journal. 43(10). 1096–1102. 7 indexed citations
16.
Nies, Mary A., et al.. (2011). The Development and Testing of an Instrument to Measure Successful Aging. Research in Gerontological Nursing. 4(3). 221–232. 70 indexed citations
17.
Bates, Amanda, et al.. (2011). BEST at home: a pilot evaluation of a home-based strength and balance exercise program. Health Promotion Journal of Australia. 22(3). 234–237. 4 indexed citations
18.
Bates, Amanda, et al.. (2009). Staying alive, staying strong: pilot evaluation of a once-weekly community-based strength training program for older adults. Health Promotion Journal of Australia. 20(1). 42–47. 16 indexed citations
19.
Kent, Bridie, et al.. (2008). A report on palliative care and cancer nurses' educational needs. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 2 indexed citations
20.
Armstrong, Margaret, et al.. (2002). Staying Active—Staying Safe: Development of a physical activity and falls prevention resource for older people who dwell in the community. New South Wales Public Health Bulletin. 13(2). 13–13. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026