Amanda Abbott
- Co-authors
- Michael G. StabinDavid C. MetzDavid BushnellSheila LindsayThomas A. HopeDaniel A. PrymaW. S. GrahamJonathan Strosberg
- Topics
- Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (6 papers)Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (5 papers)Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth AfricaCanada
In The Last Decade
Amanda Abbott
16 papers receiving 359 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Biological Psychiatry 121
- Epidemiology 102
- Oncology 93
- Neurology 89
- Behavioral Neuroscience 68
Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Abbott
This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Abbott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Abbott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Abbott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Abbott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Abbott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Abbott. The network helps show where Amanda Abbott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda Abbott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda Abbott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda Abbott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda Abbott. Amanda Abbott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | Two-years’ experience with a Zr-89 PET/CT scanner validation program for clinical trials | 1 |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 108 | |
| 7 | 44 | |
| 8 | Report on the PET/CT image-based radiation dosimetry of 18FDHT in women, an imaging agent with new applications for evaluation of androgen receptor status in patients with metastatic breast cancer. | 1 |
| 9 | 20 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 177Lu-Dotatate therapy for patients with metastatic gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: How to prepare your practice for optimal administration. | 1 |
| 13 | Bridging the gaps to build the future of clinical and pre-clinical imaging research. | 1 |
| 14 | 137 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 7 |
About Amanda Abbott
Amanda Abbott is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 17 papers that have together received 360 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (5 papers) and Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (121 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (68 citations) and Neurology (89 citations). Amanda Abbott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michael G. Stabin, David C. Metz, David Bushnell, Sheila Lindsay, Thomas A. Hope, Daniel A. Pryma, W. S. Graham, Jonathan Strosberg, Rouba Kozak and Tamás Kiss. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, NeuroImage and Clinical Cancer Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.