Amalia Turner

936 total citations · 1 hit paper
6 papers, 609 citations indexed

About

Amalia Turner is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Pollution and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Amalia Turner has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 609 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Materials Chemistry, 2 papers in Pollution and 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Amalia Turner's work include Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (3 papers), Environmental Justice and Health Disparities (2 papers) and Biomedical and Engineering Education (1 paper). Amalia Turner is often cited by papers focused on Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (3 papers), Environmental Justice and Health Disparities (2 papers) and Biomedical and Engineering Education (1 paper). Amalia Turner collaborates with scholars based in United States and Ireland. Amalia Turner's co-authors include Mark R. Wiesner, Fabienne Schwab, Guangshu Zhai, Jerald L. Schnoor, Nicholas K. Geitner, Enda Cummins, Niall O’Brien, Mark R. Wiesner, Arlene Rosenbaum and Christine Ogilvie Hendren and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Environmental Science & Technology and Nanotoxicology.

In The Last Decade

Amalia Turner

6 papers receiving 598 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Barriers, pathways and processes for uptake, translocation and accumulation of nanomaterials in plants – Critical review

2015 529 citations Fabienne Schwab, Guangshu Zhai et al. Nanotoxicology profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Amalia Turner United States	5	394	194	171	148	65	6	609
Arvind Behal Russia	5	308 0.8×	146 0.8×	136 0.8×	102 0.7×	81 1.2×	6	598
Heping Shang United States	12	288 0.7×	114 0.6×	208 1.2×	99 0.7×	40 0.6×	23	519
Chaoyi Deng United States	18	440 1.1×	177 0.9×	361 2.1×	168 1.1×	66 1.0×	38	775
Wenhe Luo China	14	433 1.1×	143 0.7×	166 1.0×	178 1.2×	33 0.5×	29	680
Jaya Borgatta United States	13	357 0.9×	58 0.3×	280 1.6×	136 0.9×	54 0.8×	19	633
Titir Guha India	11	215 0.5×	122 0.6×	243 1.4×	145 1.0×	25 0.4×	20	497
Illya A. Medina-Velo United States	15	607 1.5×	196 1.0×	413 2.4×	217 1.5×	55 0.8×	16	959
Daniel L. Starnes United States	12	383 1.0×	124 0.6×	105 0.6×	113 0.8×	29 0.4×	14	570
Sare Asli Israel	5	298 0.8×	125 0.6×	179 1.0×	111 0.8×	27 0.4×	17	498
Emily S. Bernhardt United States	3	590 1.5×	160 0.8×	66 0.4×	197 1.3×	30 0.5×	4	670

Countries citing papers authored by Amalia Turner

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amalia Turner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amalia Turner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amalia Turner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amalia Turner

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amalia Turner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amalia Turner. The network helps show where Amalia Turner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amalia Turner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amalia Turner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amalia Turner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amalia Turner. Amalia Turner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Turner, Amalia, et al.. (2024). Developing a shared understanding of translational science within CTSA hubs through facilitated retreats: A case study. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science. 8(1). e49–e49. 1 indexed citations

2.

Sipe, Joana Marie, et al.. (2023). Bringing sex toys out of the dark: exploring unmitigated risks. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(1). 6–6. 8 indexed citations

3.

Turner, Amalia, et al.. (2020). Nanoparticle affinity for natural soils: a functional assay for determining particle attachment efficiency in complex systems. Environmental Science Nano. 7(6). 1719–1729. 14 indexed citations

4.

Geitner, Nicholas K., Niall O’Brien, Amalia Turner, Enda Cummins, & Mark R. Wiesner. (2017). Measuring Nanoparticle Attachment Efficiency in Complex Systems. Environmental Science & Technology. 51(22). 13288–13294. 50 indexed citations

5.

Schwab, Fabienne, et al.. (2015). Barriers, pathways and processes for uptake, translocation and accumulation of nanomaterials in plants – Critical review. Nanotoxicology. 10(3). 257–278. 529 indexed citations breakdown →

6.

Payne-Sturges, Devon, et al.. (2012). A Review of State-Level Analytical Approaches for Evaluating Disproportionate Environmental Health Impacts. Environmental Justice. 5(4). 173–187. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact