Alpha Amadou Barry
About
In The Last Decade
Alpha Amadou Barry
4 papers receiving 94 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 48
- Infectious Diseases 32
- General Health Professions 27
- Finance 26
- Epidemiology 13
Countries citing papers authored by Alpha Amadou Barry
This map shows the geographic impact of Alpha Amadou Barry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alpha Amadou Barry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alpha Amadou Barry more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alpha Amadou Barry
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alpha Amadou Barry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alpha Amadou Barry. The network helps show where Alpha Amadou Barry may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alpha Amadou Barry
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alpha Amadou Barry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alpha Amadou Barry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alpha Amadou Barry. Alpha Amadou Barry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 37 | |
| 4 | 51 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.