Alois M. Holzer

37 total papers · 853 total citations
14 papers, 592 citations indexed

About

Alois M. Holzer is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, Alois M. Holzer has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 592 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Atmospheric Science, 9 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 2 papers in Communication. Recurrent topics in Alois M. Holzer's work include Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (9 papers), Climate variability and models (7 papers) and Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research (3 papers). Alois M. Holzer is often cited by papers focused on Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (9 papers), Climate variability and models (7 papers) and Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research (3 papers). Alois M. Holzer collaborates with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United Kingdom. Alois M. Holzer's co-authors include Pieter Groenemeijer, B. Feuerstein, Nikolai Dotzek, David M. Schultz, Bogdan Antonescu, Tomáš Púčik, Charles A. Doswell, Harold E. Brooks, Kathrin Riemann‐Campe and R. Sausen and has published in prestigious journals such as Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Atmospheric Research and Natural hazards and earth system sciences.

In The Last Decade

Alois M. Holzer

14 papers receiving 542 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Alois M. Holzer	496	469	111	37	21	14	592
John F. Weaver	531 1.1×	556 1.2×	121 1.1×	27 0.7×	29 1.4×	33	683
Eberhard Faust	414 0.8×	497 1.1×	66 0.6×	26 0.7×	72 3.4×	15	622
Roman Olson	256 0.5×	376 0.8×	47 0.4×	15 0.4×	21 1.0×	25	497
Steven T. Rumbold	367 0.7×	349 0.7×	76 0.7×	19 0.5×	13 0.6×	13	578
Julian Brimelow	401 0.8×	430 0.9×	56 0.5×	9 0.2×	9 0.4×	26	537
Jeffrey P. Craven	625 1.3×	611 1.3×	71 0.6×	42 1.1×	5 0.2×	8	680
Uwe Pfeifroth	307 0.6×	431 0.9×	69 0.6×	26 0.7×	13 0.6×	22	646
D. A. Metaxas	391 0.8×	460 1.0×	124 1.1×	9 0.2×	6 0.3×	19	632
Miriam Rorig	282 0.6×	485 1.0×	54 0.5×	71 1.9×	6 0.3×	12	519
Anton Laakso	424 0.9×	392 0.8×	50 0.5×	43 1.2×	16 0.8×	30	505

Countries citing papers authored by Alois M. Holzer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alois M. Holzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alois M. Holzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alois M. Holzer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alois M. Holzer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alois M. Holzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alois M. Holzer. The network helps show where Alois M. Holzer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alois M. Holzer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alois M. Holzer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alois M. Holzer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alois M. Holzer. Alois M. Holzer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact