Almut Rudolph

1.1k total citations
19 papers, 685 citations indexed

About

Almut Rudolph is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Almut Rudolph has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 685 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Clinical Psychology, 7 papers in Social Psychology and 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Almut Rudolph's work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (10 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (6 papers) and Obesity and Health Practices (6 papers). Almut Rudolph is often cited by papers focused on Eating Disorders and Behaviors (10 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (6 papers) and Obesity and Health Practices (6 papers). Almut Rudolph collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Austria. Almut Rudolph's co-authors include Anja Hilbert, Astrid Schütz, Michela Schröder–Abé, Anja Wiesner, Aiden P. Gregg, Constantine Sedikides, Sabrina Baldofski, Susann Blüher, Michael Riketta and Stefan Kaiser and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Obesity, Frontiers in Psychology and Obesity Reviews.

In The Last Decade

Almut Rudolph

18 papers receiving 663 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Almut Rudolph Germany 13 370 213 204 186 183 19 685
Emily K. White United States 11 503 1.4× 70 0.3× 65 0.3× 110 0.6× 124 0.7× 16 708
Danielle Knafo United States 9 236 0.6× 82 0.4× 73 0.4× 52 0.3× 128 0.7× 46 457
Josée L. Jarry Canada 17 508 1.4× 93 0.4× 62 0.3× 88 0.5× 7 0.0× 30 735
W. C. Anderson United Kingdom 2 569 1.5× 66 0.3× 90 0.4× 87 0.5× 12 0.1× 2 698
Angela A. Celio United States 11 498 1.3× 83 0.4× 200 1.0× 86 0.5× 11 0.1× 11 688
Sara M. Hofmeier United States 10 541 1.5× 44 0.2× 104 0.5× 134 0.7× 9 0.0× 11 679
Lauren A. Fowler United States 12 247 0.7× 60 0.3× 94 0.5× 30 0.2× 11 0.1× 39 520
Rachael E. Flatt United States 12 508 1.4× 82 0.4× 178 0.9× 41 0.2× 8 0.0× 30 650
John A. Hunter Australia 9 268 0.7× 86 0.4× 63 0.3× 289 1.6× 17 0.1× 13 438
Jeffrey E. Hecker United States 14 276 0.7× 93 0.4× 107 0.5× 20 0.1× 10 0.1× 28 516

Countries citing papers authored by Almut Rudolph

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Almut Rudolph's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Almut Rudolph with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Almut Rudolph more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Almut Rudolph

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Almut Rudolph. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Almut Rudolph. The network helps show where Almut Rudolph may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Almut Rudolph

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Almut Rudolph. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Almut Rudolph based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Almut Rudolph. Almut Rudolph is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Plötner, Maria, et al.. (2023). Selbstreflexion als neues Element der Lehre in den Masterstudiengängen zur Approbation in Psychotherapie. Psychologische Rundschau. 74(2). 125–127.
2.
Rudolph, Almut & Anja Hilbert. (2020). Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Postbariatric Surgery Patients With Mental Disorders: A Pilot Study. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 11. 14–14. 11 indexed citations
3.
Rudolph, Almut, et al.. (2018). Two sides of weight bias in adolescent binge‐eating disorder: Adolescents’ perceptions and maternal attitudes. International Journal of Eating Disorders. 51(12). 1339–1345. 15 indexed citations
4.
Rudolph, Almut, Michela Schröder–Abé, & Astrid Schütz. (2018). I Like Myself, I Really Do (at Least Right Now). European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 36(1). 196–206. 13 indexed citations
5.
Rudolph, Almut & Anja Hilbert. (2017). The Effects of Obesity-Related Health Messages on Explicit and Implicit Weight Bias. Frontiers in Psychology. 7. 2064–2064. 9 indexed citations
6.
Rudolph, Almut, et al.. (2016). Evaluation des einjährigen multimodalen Therapieprogramms DOC WEIGHT® 1.0 zur Gewichtsreduktion bei Patienten mit Adipositas Grad II und III. PPmP - Psychotherapie · Psychosomatik · Medizinische Psychologie. 66(8). 316–323. 12 indexed citations
7.
Baldofski, Sabrina, Almut Rudolph, B. Herbig, et al.. (2015). Weight bias internalization, emotion dysregulation, and non‐normative eating behaviors in prebariatric patients. International Journal of Eating Disorders. 49(2). 180–185. 45 indexed citations
8.
Rudolph, Almut, et al.. (2014). Psychosocial Status and Mental Health in Adolescents before and after Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review. Obesity Facts. 7(4). 233–245. 44 indexed citations
9.
Baldofski, Sabrina, B. Herbig, Christian Jurowich, et al.. (2014). Nonnormative eating behavior and psychopathology in prebariatric patients with binge-eating disorder and night eating syndrome. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases. 11(3). 621–626. 35 indexed citations
10.
Rudolph, Almut & Anja Hilbert. (2014). A novel measure to assess self-discrimination in binge-eating disorder and obesity. International Journal of Obesity. 39(2). 368–370. 15 indexed citations
11.
Rudolph, Almut, et al.. (2014). Implicit cognitive processes in binge-eating disorder and obesity. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 45(2). 285–290. 29 indexed citations
12.
13.
Rudolph, Almut. (2014). Stigmatisierung und Selbststigmatisierung. Psychotherapeut. 59(4). 306–309. 1 indexed citations
14.
Schulz, Katrin, et al.. (2013). Daniel has fallen into a muddy puddle – Schadenfreude or sympathy?. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 31(4). 363–378. 24 indexed citations
15.
Rudolph, Almut & Anja Hilbert. (2013). Post‐operative behavioural management in bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obesity Reviews. 14(4). 292–302. 123 indexed citations
16.
Rudolph, Almut, Michela Schröder–Abé, Michael Riketta, & Astrid Schütz. (2010). Easier When Done Than Said!. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology. 218(1). 12–19. 41 indexed citations
17.
Rudolph, Almut, Michela Schröder–Abé, Astrid Schütz, Aiden P. Gregg, & Constantine Sedikides. (2008). Through a Glass, Less Darkly?. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 24(4). 273–281. 68 indexed citations
18.
Schröder–Abé, Michela, Almut Rudolph, & Astrid Schütz. (2007). High implicit self‐esteem is not necessarily advantageous: discrepancies between explicit and implicit self‐esteem and their relationship with anger expression and psychological health. European Journal of Personality. 21(3). 319–339. 128 indexed citations
19.
Schröder–Abé, Michela, Almut Rudolph, Anja Wiesner, & Astrid Schütz. (2007). Self‐esteem discrepancies and defensive reactions to social feedback. International Journal of Psychology. 42(3). 174–183. 69 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026