Alison O’Regan

798 total citations
8 papers, 228 citations indexed

About

Alison O’Regan is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Alison O’Regan has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 228 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 3 papers in Clinical Psychology and 3 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Alison O’Regan's work include Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (4 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (1 paper). Alison O’Regan is often cited by papers focused on Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (4 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (1 paper). Alison O’Regan collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Alison O’Regan's co-authors include Susan L. Rossell, Sarah Queller, Sarah J. Tabrizi, Alexandra Dürr, Izelle Labuschagne, Julie C. Stout, Blair R. Leavitt, Chris Frost, Tamsyn E. Van Rheenen and Raymund A.C. Roos and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease and Psychiatry Research.

In The Last Decade

Alison O’Regan

8 papers receiving 227 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Alison O’Regan Australia	7	162	129	83	54	46	8	228
Jesús Ruiz‐Idiago Spain	8	211 1.3×	200 1.6×	86 1.0×	44 0.8×	56 1.2×	15	289
Andrea Sollom United Kingdom	3	171 1.1×	142 1.1×	63 0.8×	48 0.9×	18 0.4×	4	232
Chiachi Wang United States	6	415 2.6×	318 2.5×	153 1.8×	70 1.3×	43 0.9×	6	454
M. Bauer Germany	6	178 1.1×	118 0.9×	120 1.4×	21 0.4×	19 0.4×	12	255
Mark Groves United States	8	221 1.4×	224 1.7×	86 1.0×	37 0.7×	19 0.4×	14	286
Ida Unmack Larsen Denmark	8	143 0.9×	104 0.8×	69 0.8×	42 0.8×	24 0.5×	14	203
Alena Zumrová Czechia	11	111 0.7×	47 0.4×	129 1.6×	60 1.1×	123 2.7×	29	297
Ian H. Kratter United States	9	156 1.0×	70 0.5×	173 2.1×	14 0.3×	56 1.2×	17	317
Sarah M. Fayad United States	7	101 0.6×	251 1.9×	25 0.3×	43 0.8×	88 1.9×	8	345
Andrea C. Solomon United States	7	532 3.3×	409 3.2×	256 3.1×	74 1.4×	85 1.8×	9	632

Countries citing papers authored by Alison O’Regan

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alison O’Regan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alison O’Regan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alison O’Regan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alison O’Regan

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alison O’Regan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alison O’Regan. The network helps show where Alison O’Regan may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alison O’Regan

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alison O’Regan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alison O’Regan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alison O’Regan. Alison O’Regan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Labuschagne, Izelle, Amy Mulick, Rachael I. Scahill, et al.. (2016). Visuospatial Processing Deficits Linked to Posterior Brain Regions in Premanifest and Early Stage Huntington’s Disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 22(6). 595–608. 42 indexed citations

Rossell, Susan L., et al.. (2014). Investigating facial affect processing in psychosis: A study using the Comprehensive Affective Testing System. Schizophrenia Research. 157(1-3). 55–59. 12 indexed citations

Jones, Rebecca, Julie C. Stout, Izelle Labuschagne, et al.. (2014). The Potential of Composite Cognitive Scores for Tracking Progression in Huntington's Disease. Journal of Huntington s Disease. 3(2). 197–207. 7 indexed citations

Rossell, Susan L., et al.. (2013). Investigating affective prosody in psychosis: A study using the Comprehensive Affective Testing System. Psychiatry Research. 210(3). 896–900. 32 indexed citations

Stout, Julie C., Rebecca Jones, Izelle Labuschagne, et al.. (2012). Evaluation of longitudinal 12 and 24 month cognitive outcomes in premanifest and early Huntington's disease. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 83(7). 687–694. 107 indexed citations

Dumas, Eve M., Miranda J. Say, Rebecca Jones, et al.. (2012). Visual Working Memory Impairment in Premanifest Gene-Carriers and Early Huntington's Disease. Journal of Huntington s Disease. 1(1). 97–106. 14 indexed citations

Morgan, Celia J. A., et al.. (2009). Is Semantic Processing Impaired in Individuals With High Schizotypy?. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 197(4). 232–238. 13 indexed citations

Rossell, Susan L. & Alison O’Regan. (2008). JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS IN DELUSIONS: FACT OR FALLACY?. Schizophrenia Research. 102(1-3). 127–127. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact