Alison M. Parker

89 total papers · 518 total citations
29 papers, 233 citations indexed

About

Alison M. Parker is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Marketing. According to data from OpenAlex, Alison M. Parker has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 233 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 6 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 5 papers in Marketing. Recurrent topics in Alison M. Parker's work include Race, History, and American Society (7 papers), American History and Culture (5 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (5 papers). Alison M. Parker is often cited by papers focused on Race, History, and American Society (7 papers), American History and Culture (5 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (5 papers). Alison M. Parker collaborates with scholars based in United States, Kenya and United Kingdom. Alison M. Parker's co-authors include Richard Abel, A. Bagshawe, Henry Foy, Athena Kondi, C. A. Linsell, Stephanie Cole, Elliott West, B. P. Fitzgerald, L.M. Lawrence and Barbara B. Anderson and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, The Lancet and JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

In The Last Decade

Alison M. Parker

24 papers receiving 150 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Alison M. Parker 63 36 31 29 23 29 233
Bruce B. Campbell 106 1.7× 20 0.6× 18 0.6× 16 0.6× 51 2.2× 29 299
Russell Webb 101 1.6× 67 1.9× 32 1.0× 77 2.7× 75 3.3× 18 318
Robert G. Kaufman 91 1.4× 25 0.7× 40 1.3× 30 1.0× 116 5.0× 35 247
Jocelyn Harris 57 0.9× 33 0.9× 151 4.9× 87 3.0× 23 1.0× 24 299
Christopher Morris 50 0.8× 50 1.4× 17 0.5× 33 1.1× 37 1.6× 42 236
Deborah Willis 58 0.9× 16 0.4× 50 1.6× 33 1.1× 11 0.5× 36 242
Ann J. Lane 100 1.6× 20 0.6× 26 0.8× 64 2.2× 56 2.4× 35 254
Thomas A. Krueger 62 1.0× 14 0.4× 37 1.2× 54 1.9× 27 1.2× 23 190
Anthony Brundage 107 1.7× 87 2.4× 64 2.1× 93 3.2× 52 2.3× 31 294
Angela V. John 123 2.0× 96 2.7× 15 0.5× 92 3.2× 28 1.2× 28 252

Countries citing papers authored by Alison M. Parker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alison M. Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alison M. Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alison M. Parker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alison M. Parker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alison M. Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alison M. Parker. The network helps show where Alison M. Parker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alison M. Parker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alison M. Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alison M. Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alison M. Parker. Alison M. Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026