Alison Dacey

734 total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 520 citations indexed

About

Alison Dacey is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Alison Dacey has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 520 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 5 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 1 paper in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Alison Dacey's work include Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (6 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (3 papers) and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (2 papers). Alison Dacey is often cited by papers focused on Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (6 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (3 papers) and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (2 papers). Alison Dacey collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Alison Dacey's co-authors include Gordon C. S. Smith, Dharmintra Pasupathy, Ian R. White, Ulla Sovio, Emma Cook, D. Stephen Charnock‐Jones, Ed Wilson and Alexandros A Moraitis and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and PLoS Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Alison Dacey

7 papers receiving 514 citations

Hit Papers

Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal thi... 2015 2026 2018 2022 2015 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Alison Dacey United Kingdom 3 460 455 66 37 25 7 520
Meghana Toal Canada 6 328 0.7× 347 0.8× 24 0.4× 42 1.1× 21 0.8× 6 411
Luana Danti Italy 10 296 0.6× 289 0.6× 103 1.6× 44 1.2× 31 1.2× 16 396
Javier Caradeux Chile 10 495 1.1× 528 1.2× 65 1.0× 59 1.6× 11 0.4× 24 587
M. Fiolna United Kingdom 7 409 0.9× 490 1.1× 30 0.5× 68 1.8× 47 1.9× 14 559
Rita Sollien Norway 7 263 0.6× 249 0.5× 48 0.7× 20 0.5× 34 1.4× 7 334
Cecilia Villalaín Spain 12 257 0.6× 298 0.7× 87 1.3× 62 1.7× 32 1.3× 59 421
Henk A. Bremer Netherlands 10 241 0.5× 260 0.6× 65 1.0× 37 1.0× 19 0.8× 18 314
L. Youssef Spain 12 269 0.6× 292 0.6× 29 0.4× 41 1.1× 16 0.6× 38 402
Fiona Milne Canada 8 265 0.6× 308 0.7× 20 0.3× 42 1.1× 27 1.1× 13 389
K. Tenenbaum‐Gavish Israel 4 340 0.7× 349 0.8× 46 0.7× 83 2.2× 12 0.5× 5 438

Countries citing papers authored by Alison Dacey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alison Dacey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alison Dacey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alison Dacey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alison Dacey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alison Dacey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alison Dacey. The network helps show where Alison Dacey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alison Dacey

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alison Dacey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alison Dacey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alison Dacey. Alison Dacey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
1.
Moraitis, Alexandros A, et al.. (2019). Screening for breech presentation using universal late-pregnancy ultrasonography: A prospective cohort study and cost effectiveness analysis. PLoS Medicine. 16(4). e1002778–e1002778. 36 indexed citations
2.
Sovio, Ulla, Ian R. White, Alison Dacey, Dharmintra Pasupathy, & Gordon C. S. Smith. (2016). Screening for Fetal Growth Restriction With Universal Third Trimester Ultrasonography in Nulliparous Women in the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) Study. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 71(3). 133–134. 2 indexed citations
3.
Sovio, Ulla, Ian R. White, Alison Dacey, Dharmintra Pasupathy, & Gordon C. S. Smith. (2015). Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study: a prospective cohort study. The Lancet. 386(10008). 2089–2097. 423 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Sovio, Ulla, Gordon C. S. Smith, Alison Dacey, Dharmintra Pasupathy, & Ian R. White. (2014). 151: Screening for fetal growth restriction (FGR) using universal third trimester ultrasonography: a prospective cohort study of 3,977 nulliparous women. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 212(1). S92–S92. 1 indexed citations
5.
Sovio, Ulla, Gordon C. S. Smith, & Alison Dacey. (2013). 206: First trimester PAPP-A and the risk of fetal growth restriction. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 210(1). S112–S112. 1 indexed citations
6.
Sovio, Ulla, Gordon C. S. Smith, & Alison Dacey. (2013). LB1: Level 1 evidence for the diagnostic effectiveness of routine sonography as a screening test for small for gestational age (SGA) infants. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 210(1). S408–S408. 2 indexed citations
7.
Pasupathy, Dharmintra, Alison Dacey, Emma Cook, et al.. (2008). Study protocol. A prospective cohort study of unselected primiparous women: the pregnancy outcome prediction study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 8(1). 51–51. 55 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026