Alison C. Testa
Impact in
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
- Plant Science top 10%
- Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics
- Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
- Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
- Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Papers in
-
- Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology 3
- Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics 3
- Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity 2
- Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions 1
-
- RNA Research and Splicing 2
- Co-authors
- Richard P. Oliver (5 shared papers)James K. Hane (4 shared papers)Simon R. Ellwood (3 shared papers)P.J.G.M. de Wit (1 shared paper)Mark S. McLean (1 shared paper)Anke Martin (1 shared paper)Mark W. Sutherland (1 shared paper)Barsha Poudel (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Journal of Human Genetics (1 paper)BMC Genomics (1 paper)Acta Neuropathologica Communications (1 paper)Phytopathology (1 paper)Genome Biology and Evolution (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaNetherlandsGermany
In The Last Decade
Alison C. Testa
8 papers receiving 317 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Cell Biology 118
- Plant Science 231
- Horticulture 5
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 38
- Endocrinology 10
Countries citing papers authored by Alison C. Testa
This map shows the geographic impact of Alison C. Testa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alison C. Testa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alison C. Testa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alison C. Testa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alison C. Testa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alison C. Testa. The network helps show where Alison C. Testa may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alison C. Testa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 125 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 87 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 32 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 25 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 20 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 4 |
About Alison C. Testa
Alison C. Testa is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Genetics, having authored 8 papers that have together received 319 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (4 papers), Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (3 papers), Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (3 papers), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (2 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (2 papers), Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (1 paper), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (1 paper) and Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (118 citations), Plant Science (231 citations), Horticulture (5 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (38 citations) and Endocrinology (10 citations). Alison C. Testa has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Richard P. Oliver, James K. Hane, Simon R. Ellwood, P.J.G.M. de Wit, Mark S. McLean, Anke Martin, Mark W. Sutherland, Barsha Poudel, Marcus L. Hastie and Yew‐Foon Tan. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Human Genetics, BMC Genomics, Acta Neuropathologica Communications, Phytopathology and Genome Biology and Evolution.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.