Alfredo Estrada
About
In The Last Decade
Alfredo Estrada
5 papers receiving 291 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- General Health Professions 199
- Sociology and Political Science 172
- Health 95
- Pharmacy 91
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 70
Countries citing papers authored by Alfredo Estrada
This map shows the geographic impact of Alfredo Estrada's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alfredo Estrada with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alfredo Estrada more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alfredo Estrada
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alfredo Estrada. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alfredo Estrada. The network helps show where Alfredo Estrada may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alfredo Estrada
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alfredo Estrada. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alfredo Estrada based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alfredo Estrada. Alfredo Estrada is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 87 | |
| 8 | 81 | |
| 9 | 163 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.