Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Interactive digital photomontage
2004629 citationsAseem Agarwala, Mira Dontcheva et al.ACM Transactions on Graphicsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Alex Colburn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alex Colburn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alex Colburn more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alex Colburn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alex Colburn. The network helps show where Alex Colburn may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alex Colburn
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alex Colburn.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alex Colburn based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Alex Colburn. Alex Colburn is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bautista, Miguel Ángel, et al.. (2022). Fast and Explicit Neural View Synthesis. 2022 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV). 11–20.17 indexed citations
Colburn, Alex, A. Agarwala, Aaron Hertzmann, Brian Curless, & Michael F. Cohen. (2012). Image-Based Remodeling. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. 19(1). 56–66.14 indexed citations
6.
Koppal, Sanjeev J., et al.. (2011). A viewer-centric editor for stereoscopic camera. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.3 indexed citations
7.
Koppal, Sanjeev J., et al.. (2010). A Viewer-Centric Editor for 3D Movies. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 31(1). 20–35.46 indexed citations
8.
Zheng, Ke, Alex Colburn, Aseem Agarwala, et al.. (2009). Parallax photography: creating 3D cinematic effects from stills. Graphics Interface. 111–118.22 indexed citations
9.
Zheng, Ke, Alex Colburn, Aseem Agarwala, et al.. (2009). A Consistent Segmentation Approach to Image-based Rendering.2 indexed citations
10.
Wang, Jue, Pravin Bhat, Alex Colburn, Maneesh Agrawala, & Michael F. Cohen. (2005). Interactive video cutout. 585–594.64 indexed citations
11.
Wang, Jue, Pravin Bhat, Alex Colburn, Maneesh Agrawala, & Michael F. Cohen. (2005). Interactive video cutout. ACM Transactions on Graphics. 24(3). 585–594.227 indexed citations
12.
Bhat, Pravin, Jue Wang, Alex Colburn, Maneesh Agrawala, & Michael F. Cohen. (2005). Inside interactive video cutout. 84–84.5 indexed citations
13.
Agarwala, Aseem, Mira Dontcheva, Maneesh Agrawala, et al.. (2004). Interactive digital photomontage. ACM Transactions on Graphics. 23(3). 294–302.629 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Agarwala, Aseem, Mira Dontcheva, Maneesh Agrawala, et al.. (2004). Interactive digital photomontage. 294–302.151 indexed citations
15.
Cohen, Michael, Alex Colburn, & Steven M. Drucker. (2003). Image Stacks. 4.16 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.