Alessia Cavo
About
In The Last Decade
Alessia Cavo
13 papers receiving 122 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 86
- Oncology 58
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 28
- Molecular Biology 27
- Cancer Research 18
Countries citing papers authored by Alessia Cavo
This map shows the geographic impact of Alessia Cavo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alessia Cavo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alessia Cavo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alessia Cavo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alessia Cavo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alessia Cavo. The network helps show where Alessia Cavo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alessia Cavo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alessia Cavo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alessia Cavo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alessia Cavo. Alessia Cavo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 26 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 25 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 7 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.