Alem Fitwi
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 5%
- Information Systems top 10%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Computer Networks and Communications
- Signal Processing
- Co-authors
- Yu ChenSencun ZhuSeyed Yahya NikoueiDeeraj NagothuErik BlaschRonghua XuNing ZhouGenshe Chen
- Topics
- Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques (6 papers)Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods (6 papers)Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption (6 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaElectronicsIEEE Transactions on Services Computing
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Alem Fitwi
16 papers receiving 251 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 171
- Information Systems 75
- Artificial Intelligence 74
- Computer Networks and Communications 54
- Signal Processing 26
Countries citing papers authored by Alem Fitwi
This map shows the geographic impact of Alem Fitwi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alem Fitwi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alem Fitwi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alem Fitwi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alem Fitwi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alem Fitwi. The network helps show where Alem Fitwi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alem Fitwi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alem Fitwi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alem Fitwi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alem Fitwi. Alem Fitwi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 31 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | BlendSPS: A BLockchain-ENabled Decentralized Smart Public Safety System | 4 |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | 46 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | Performance Analysis of Chaotic Encryption Using a Shared Image as a Key | 12 |
About Alem Fitwi
Alem Fitwi is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Instrumentation and Computer Science Applications, having authored 17 papers that have together received 268 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques (6 papers), Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods (6 papers) and Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (171 citations), Instrumentation (24 citations) and Information Systems (75 citations). Alem Fitwi has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Yu Chen, Sencun Zhu, Seyed Yahya Nikouei, Deeraj Nagothu, Erik Blasch, Ronghua Xu, Ning Zhou, Genshe Chen, Meng Yuan and Meng Yuan. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Electronics and IEEE Transactions on Services Computing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.