Aleksandr Farseev

465 citations
21 papers · 276 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Aleksandr Farseev

19 papers receiving 268 citations

Peers

Aleksandr Farseev
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Information Systems 139
  • Artificial Intelligence 132
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 79
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 46
  • Transportation 25
Replace Gen Hattori with:
Gen Hattori Japan
Hao Fu China
Shoaib Jameel United Kingdom
Ignacio Fernández-Tobías Spain
Ming Dong China
Yanen Li United States
Naohiro Matsumura Japan
Lifa Wu China
Lalindra De Silva United States
Fattane Zarrinkalam Canada
Aleksandr Farseev relative to Gen Hattori Japan Gen Hattori's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Gen Hattori · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Aleksandr Farseev

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Aleksandr Farseev's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aleksandr Farseev with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aleksandr Farseev more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Aleksandr Farseev

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aleksandr Farseev. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aleksandr Farseev. The network helps show where Aleksandr Farseev may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Aleksandr Farseev, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Aleksandr Farseev Line = papers co-authored together Aleksandr Farseev links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201562
2 201746
3 201726
4 201723
5 201721
6 201715
7 201812
8 202212
9 201512
10 201610
11 20169
12 20228
13 20234
14 20234
15 20203
16 20173
17 20232
18 20232
19 20192
20 20210

About Aleksandr Farseev

Aleksandr Farseev is a scholar working on Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Sociology and Political Science and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 21 papers that have together received 276 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Recommender Systems and Techniques (9 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (5 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (4 papers), Advanced Graph Neural Networks (4 papers), Video Analysis and Summarization (3 papers), Topic Modeling (3 papers), Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining (2 papers) and Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems (139 citations), Artificial Intelligence (132 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (79 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (46 citations) and Transportation (25 citations). Aleksandr Farseev has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, Russia and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Tat‐Seng Chua, Andrey Filchenkov, Liqiang Nie, Mohammad Akbari, Sergey Nikolenko, Meng Wang, Luming Zhang, Richang Hong, Denis Kotkov and Alexander Semenov. Their work appears in journals such as ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Frontiers in Big Data, ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact