Alan Nash

1.3k citations
23 papers · 642 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Alan Nash

22 papers receiving 589 citations

Peers

Alan Nash
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Computer Networks and Communications 520
  • Signal Processing 183
  • Artificial Intelligence 535
  • Management Science and Operations Research 146
  • Information Systems 140
Replace Jef Wijsen with:
Jef Wijsen Belgium
Edward Sciore United States
Jens Lechtenbörger Germany
Mokrane Bouzeghoub France
Orri Erling United States
Rares Vernica United States
Carlos Hurtado Chile
Upen S. Chakravarthy United States
Johann Christoph Freytag Germany
Jan Rittinger Germany
Alan Nash relative to Jef Wijsen Belgium Jef Wijsen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jef Wijsen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alan Nash

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alan Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alan Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alan Nash more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alan Nash

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alan Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alan Nash. The network helps show where Alan Nash may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Alan Nash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alan Nash Line = papers co-authored together Alan Nash links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008147
2 200854
3 201054
4 200653
5 200849
6 200648
7 200735
8 200533
9 200732
10 200631
11 200424
12
Foundations of information integration
200621
13 201021
14 20109
15 20118
16
The Elements of C Programming Style
19926
17 20045
18 20044
19 20033
20 20032

About Alan Nash

Alan Nash is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Signal Processing and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 23 papers that have together received 642 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Database Systems and Queries (15 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (10 papers), Data Management and Algorithms (5 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (5 papers), Distributed systems and fault tolerance (3 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (3 papers), Data Quality and Management (3 papers) and Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Networks and Communications (520 citations), Signal Processing (183 citations), Artificial Intelligence (535 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (146 citations) and Information Systems (140 citations). Alan Nash has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Alin Deutsch, Philip A. Bernstein, Sergey Melnik, Georg Gottlob, Bertram Ludäscher, Ronald Fagin, Victor Vianu, Todd J. Green, Luc Segoufin and Phokion G. Kolaitis. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the ACM, ACM Transactions on Database Systems, Logical Methods in Computer Science, Theoretical Computer Science and Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact