al et
About
In The Last Decade
al et
81 papers receiving 3.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 161
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1.8k
- Physiology 1.0k
- Surgery 533
- Epidemiology 432
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 374
Countries citing papers authored by al et
This map shows the geographic impact of al et's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by al et with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites al et more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by al et
This network shows the impact of papers produced by al et. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by al et. The network helps show where al et may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of al et
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of al et. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of al et based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with al et. al et is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 141 | |
| 17 | 67 | |
| 18 | 24 | |
| 19 | 129 | |
| 20 | 6 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.