Akiko Enju
- Plant Science top 0.5%
- Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance 5
- Plant Molecular Biology Research 4
- Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism 4
- Chromosomal and Genetic Variations 3
- Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity 3
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Plant Gene Expression Analysis 3
- Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms 3
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 5%
- Crop Yield and Soil Fertility 3
- Biochemistry top 10%
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Motoaki SekiKazuo ShinozakiMari NarusakaJunko IshidaMaiko NakajimaTetsuya SakuraiMasakazu SatouAsako Kamiya
- Partner nations
- JapanAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Akiko Enju
18 papers receiving 3.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Plant Science 2.8k
- Molecular Biology 1.8k
- Agronomy and Crop Science 109
- Biochemistry 74
- Cell Biology 144
Countries citing papers authored by Akiko Enju
This map shows the geographic impact of Akiko Enju's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Akiko Enju with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Akiko Enju more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Akiko Enju
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Akiko Enju. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Akiko Enju. The network helps show where Akiko Enju may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Akiko Enju, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 20 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 52 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 96 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 34 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 87 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 194 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 104 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 104 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 14 | |
| 11 | [Arabidopsis functional genomics using full-length cDNAs]. | 2003 | 1 |
| 12 | 2003 | 43 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 64 | |
| 14 | Functional Annotation of a Full-Length Arabidopsis cDNA Collectionbreakdown → | 2002 | 514 |
| 15 | Monitoring the expression profiles of 7000 Arabidopsis genes under drought, cold and high‐salinity stresses using a full‐length cDNA microarraybreakdown → | 2002 | 1536 |
| 16 | 2002 | 22 | |
| 17 | 2002 | 376 | |
| 18 | DO TWO GPAT ISOZYMES ACCUMULATE DIFFERENTIALLY IN DEVELOPING SQUASH ORGANS | 2000 | 1 |
| 19 | 2000 | 8 |
About Akiko Enju
Akiko Enju is a scholar working on Plant Science, Agronomy and Crop Science and Biochemistry, having authored 19 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (5 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (4 papers), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (4 papers), Plant Gene Expression Analysis (3 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (3 papers), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (3 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (3 papers) and Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (2.8k citations), Molecular Biology (1.8k citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (109 citations). Akiko Enju has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Motoaki Seki, Kazuo Shinozaki, Mari Narusaka, Junko Ishida, Maiko Nakajima, Tetsuya Sakurai, Masakazu Satou, Asako Kamiya, Kenji Akiyama and Jun Kawai. Their work appears in journals such as Science, New Phytologist and The Plant Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.