Akhela Umapathi
About
In The Last Decade
Akhela Umapathi
8 papers receiving 490 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Materials Chemistry 337
- Biomedical Engineering 198
- Molecular Biology 125
- Biomaterials 85
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 78
Countries citing papers authored by Akhela Umapathi
This map shows the geographic impact of Akhela Umapathi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Akhela Umapathi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Akhela Umapathi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Akhela Umapathi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Akhela Umapathi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Akhela Umapathi. The network helps show where Akhela Umapathi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Akhela Umapathi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Akhela Umapathi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Akhela Umapathi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Akhela Umapathi. Akhela Umapathi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21 | |
| 2 | 95 | |
| 3 | 113 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 58 | |
| 6 | 26 | |
| 7 | 34 | |
| 8 | 150 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.