Ajit K. Das
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Health
- Education
- Co-authors
- John M. LittrellBhabesh Dutta
- Topics
- Counseling Practices and Supervision (4 papers)Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (2 papers)Media Influence and Health (2 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Counseling & DevelopmentPsychological Reports
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Ajit K. Das
15 papers receiving 210 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Social Psychology 130
- Clinical Psychology 112
- Sociology and Political Science 87
- Health 34
- Education 30
Countries citing papers authored by Ajit K. Das
This map shows the geographic impact of Ajit K. Das's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ajit K. Das with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ajit K. Das more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ajit K. Das
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ajit K. Das. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ajit K. Das. The network helps show where Ajit K. Das may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ajit K. Das
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ajit K. Das. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ajit K. Das based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ajit K. Das. Ajit K. Das is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Phytochemical study of selected medicinal plants used by the maring tribe of Chandel district, Manipur, India | 2 |
| 2 | On the use of Dalbergia stipulacea Roxb. (Fabaceae) in oral healthcare with supplementary notes on species used in oral hygiene in Manipur, India | 2 |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 27 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 99 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 27 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | Toward Multicultural Education and Counseling: The Duluth Experience. | 1 |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | Probable Impact of New Technology on Family Life. | 0 |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 34 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | International Students: Untapped Resource for Psychological Education. | 0 |
About Ajit K. Das
Ajit K. Das is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 260 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Counseling Practices and Supervision (4 papers), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (2 papers) and Media Influence and Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (130 citations), Clinical Psychology (112 citations) and Applied Psychology (22 citations). Ajit K. Das has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John M. Littrell and Bhabesh Dutta. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Counseling & Development and Psychological Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.