Aisha Siddiquah
About
In The Last Decade
Aisha Siddiquah
7 papers receiving 302 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Plant Science 123
- Molecular Biology 99
- Materials Chemistry 82
- Complementary and alternative medicine 57
- Food Science 49
Countries citing papers authored by Aisha Siddiquah
This map shows the geographic impact of Aisha Siddiquah's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aisha Siddiquah with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aisha Siddiquah more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Aisha Siddiquah
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aisha Siddiquah. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aisha Siddiquah. The network helps show where Aisha Siddiquah may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Aisha Siddiquah
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Aisha Siddiquah. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Aisha Siddiquah based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Aisha Siddiquah. Aisha Siddiquah is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 52 | |
| 2 | 42 | |
| 3 | 39 | |
| 4 | 71 | |
| 5 | 39 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 52 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.