Ainslea Cross

573 citations
20 papers · 333 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Ainslea Cross

18 papers receiving 323 citations

Peers

Ainslea Cross
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Applied Psychology 35
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 83
  • Conservation 13
  • Rehabilitation 26
  • Clinical Psychology 76
Replace Angelia Mosley‐Williams with:
Angelia Mosley‐Williams United States
Nuray Dayapoğlu Türkiye
Marie‐Claire Gay France
Norbert Grulke Germany
Stephanie A. Reid‐Arndt United States
Stephanie H. Felgoise United States
Tariq Saleem United Kingdom
Carly L. Paterson United States
Emma H. Collette Netherlands
Ilse Stuive Netherlands
Ainslea Cross relative to Angelia Mosley‐Williams United States Angelia Mosley‐Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Angelia Mosley‐Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ainslea Cross

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ainslea Cross's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ainslea Cross with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ainslea Cross more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ainslea Cross

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ainslea Cross. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ainslea Cross. The network helps show where Ainslea Cross may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Ainslea Cross, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ainslea Cross Line = papers co-authored together Ainslea Cross links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201881
2 201966
3 202059
4 201935
5 202022
6 201720
7 202114
8 20228
9
The impact of patient participation direct enhanced service on patient reference groups in primary care: a qualitative study.
20145
10 20204
11 20204
12 20184
13 20163
14 20223
15 20242
16
Psychosocial impact of caregiving in dementia and quality of life: a systematic review and meta-synthesis
20171
17 20231
18 20211
19 20170
20 20170

About Ainslea Cross

Ainslea Cross is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Oncology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Clinical Psychology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 333 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (3 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (35 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (83 citations), Conservation (13 citations), Rehabilitation (26 citations) and Clinical Psychology (76 citations). Ainslea Cross has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Kosovo. Frequent co-authors include David Sheffield, Gülcan Garip, Jasmine Heath Hearn, David Robertshaw, J. Yoon Irons, Dawn Forman, Kreshnik Hoti, Jeff Hughes, Kajal Gokal and Shona Agarwal. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology and Health, Journal of Hypertension, BMC Neurology, Journal of Human Hypertension and Health Psychology Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact