Aimee Pierce

417 total citations
10 papers, 184 citations indexed

About

Aimee Pierce is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Aimee Pierce has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 184 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 4 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 3 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in Aimee Pierce's work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (7 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers) and Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (3 papers). Aimee Pierce is often cited by papers focused on Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (7 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers) and Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (3 papers). Aimee Pierce collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Bulgaria. Aimee Pierce's co-authors include Claudia H. Kawas, Szofia Bullain, Joshua D. Grill, S. Ahmad Sajjadi, Daniel L. Gillen, Nasim Sheikh‐Bahaei, Megan Witbracht, Adrijana Gombosev, Dean M. Hartley and Gil D. Rabinovici and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS Medicine, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease and Alzheimer s & Dementia.

In The Last Decade

Aimee Pierce

10 papers receiving 184 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Aimee Pierce United States	6	94	54	50	46	33	10	184
Carolyn Langlois United States	5	90 1.0×	94 1.7×	23 0.5×	35 0.8×	45 1.4×	14	199
Angeladine Kenne Malaha France	4	117 1.2×	45 0.8×	60 1.2×	17 0.4×	35 1.1×	5	250
Ayda Rostamzadeh Germany	7	98 1.0×	45 0.8×	27 0.5×	25 0.5×	27 0.8×	23	152
Oskar Frisell Sweden	3	128 1.4×	44 0.8×	69 1.4×	17 0.4×	42 1.3×	7	258
Stefanie Danielle Piña‐Escudero United States	10	92 1.0×	45 0.8×	46 0.9×	20 0.4×	14 0.4×	22	239
Emma Law United Kingdom	8	86 0.9×	55 1.0×	73 1.5×	53 1.2×	13 0.4×	14	255
Karim Tifratène France	9	151 1.6×	73 1.4×	27 0.5×	33 0.7×	17 0.5×	16	270
Chris Lynch United Kingdom	5	53 0.6×	36 0.7×	53 1.1×	17 0.4×	17 0.5×	10	207
George Vradenburg United States	4	75 0.8×	52 1.0×	23 0.5×	15 0.3×	58 1.8×	11	156
Jalayne J. Arias United States	8	181 1.9×	134 2.5×	37 0.7×	73 1.6×	70 2.1×	34	352

Countries citing papers authored by Aimee Pierce

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Aimee Pierce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aimee Pierce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aimee Pierce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Aimee Pierce

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aimee Pierce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aimee Pierce. The network helps show where Aimee Pierce may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Aimee Pierce

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Aimee Pierce. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Aimee Pierce based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Aimee Pierce. Aimee Pierce is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

Grill, Joshua D., Rema Raman, Karin Ernström, et al.. (2025). Disclosure of elevated amyloid status is not associated with long‐term suicidality in a preclinical AD trial. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 21(2). e14623–e14623. 2 indexed citations

Kaye, Jeffrey, Aimee Pierce, Lisa C. Silbert, et al.. (2023). DETECT‐AD (Digital Evaluations and Technologies Enabling Clinical Translation for Alzheimer’s Disease): A simulated anti‐amyloid clinical trial using digital biomarkers as primary outcome measures. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 19(S14). 1 indexed citations

Wang, Hao, et al.. (2022). Patient Portal Use Among Diabetic Patients With Different Races and Ethnicities. Journal of Clinical Medicine Research. 14(10). 400–408. 3 indexed citations

Pierce, Aimee, et al.. (2018). Participant Satisfaction With Learning Alzheimer Disease Clinical Trial Results. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders. 32(4). 366–368. 2 indexed citations

Grill, Joshua D., et al.. (2018). Constructing a Local Potential Participant Registry to Improve Alzheimer’s Disease Clinical Research Recruitment. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. 63(3). 1055–1063. 38 indexed citations

Pierce, Aimee & Claudia H. Kawas. (2017). Dementia in the oldest old: Beyond Alzheimer disease. PLoS Medicine. 14(3). e1002263–e1002263. 23 indexed citations

Grill, Joshua D., Liana G. Apostolova, Szofia Bullain, et al.. (2017). Communicating mild cognitive impairment diagnoses with and without amyloid imaging. Alzheimer s Research & Therapy. 9(1). 35–35. 51 indexed citations

Sheikh‐Bahaei, Nasim, S. Ahmad Sajjadi, & Aimee Pierce. (2017). Current Role for Biomarkers in Clinical Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia. Current Treatment Options in Neurology. 19(12). 46–46. 17 indexed citations

Pierce, Aimee, Szofia Bullain, & Claudia H. Kawas. (2017). Late-Onset Alzheimer Disease. Neurologic Clinics. 35(2). 283–293. 39 indexed citations

10.

Grill, Joshua D., et al.. (2017). Attitudes toward Potential Participant Registries. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. 56(3). 939–946. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact