Aime L. Burns

1.0k total citations
10 papers, 768 citations indexed

About

Aime L. Burns is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Molecular Biology and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. According to data from OpenAlex, Aime L. Burns has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 768 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Rehabilitation, 3 papers in Molecular Biology and 3 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. Recurrent topics in Aime L. Burns's work include Wound Healing and Treatments (5 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (3 papers) and Immune Response and Inflammation (2 papers). Aime L. Burns is often cited by papers focused on Wound Healing and Treatments (5 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (3 papers) and Immune Response and Inflammation (2 papers). Aime L. Burns collaborates with scholars based in United States. Aime L. Burns's co-authors include Luisa A. DiPietro, Mari E. Swift, Richard L. Gamelli, Ahalia M. Ferreira, Annette M. Matthies, Katherine A. Radek, Julia V. Dovi, Ravi Shankar, Traci A. Wilgus and Elizabeth J. Kovacs and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, American Journal Of Pathology and Journal of Investigative Dermatology.

In The Last Decade

Aime L. Burns

10 papers receiving 739 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Aime L. Burns United States	9	313	188	171	113	95	10	768
Tadaki Sugawara Japan	8	239 0.8×	169 0.9×	152 0.9×	86 0.8×	82 0.9×	13	691
Stefano Bacci Italy	22	280 0.9×	167 0.9×	231 1.4×	143 1.3×	233 2.5×	83	1.1k
Takashi Iwashina Canada	17	324 1.0×	222 1.2×	103 0.6×	103 0.9×	234 2.5×	29	847
Anisyah Ridiandries Australia	12	229 0.7×	190 1.0×	112 0.7×	91 0.8×	39 0.4×	13	701
Yoko Yokoyama Japan	21	229 0.7×	352 1.9×	311 1.8×	131 1.2×	198 2.1×	64	1.1k
J M Hefton United States	12	464 1.5×	244 1.3×	177 1.0×	241 2.1×	154 1.6×	15	1.0k
Hsiung–Fei Chien Taiwan	21	104 0.3×	154 0.8×	136 0.8×	116 1.0×	58 0.6×	40	935
Vittorio Cavallari Italy	15	229 0.7×	183 1.0×	43 0.3×	110 1.0×	121 1.3×	57	881
Mari E. Swift United States	8	231 0.7×	470 2.5×	155 0.9×	104 0.9×	65 0.7×	8	985
Brian C. Wulff United States	17	252 0.8×	197 1.0×	197 1.2×	83 0.7×	347 3.7×	19	860

Countries citing papers authored by Aime L. Burns

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Aime L. Burns's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aime L. Burns with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aime L. Burns more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Aime L. Burns

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aime L. Burns. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aime L. Burns. The network helps show where Aime L. Burns may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Aime L. Burns

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Aime L. Burns. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Aime L. Burns based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Aime L. Burns. Aime L. Burns is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Radek, Katherine A., et al.. (2005). Acute ethanol exposure impairs angiogenesis and the proliferative phase of wound healing. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 289(3). H1084–H1090. 76 indexed citations

2.

Ferreira, Ahalia M., Barrett J. Rollins, Douglas E. Faunce, et al.. (2005). The effect of MCP-1 depletion on chemokine and chemokine-related gene expression: evidence for a complex network in acute inflammation. Cytokine. 30(2). 64–71. 42 indexed citations

3.

Wilgus, Traci A., Annette M. Matthies, Katherine A. Radek, et al.. (2005). Novel Function for Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1 on Epidermal Keratinocytes. American Journal Of Pathology. 167(5). 1257–1266. 118 indexed citations

4.

DiPietro, Luisa A. & Aime L. Burns. (2003). Wound healing : methods and protocols. Humana Press eBooks. 37 indexed citations

5.

Burns, Aime L., et al.. (2003). Method for Detection and Quantitation of Leukocytes During Wound Healing. Humana Press eBooks. 78. 359–368. 1 indexed citations

6.

Ferreira, Ahalia M., et al.. (2003). Mast cells modulate the inflammatory but not the proliferative response in healing wounds. Wound Repair and Regeneration. 11(1). 46–54. 131 indexed citations

7.

DiPietro, Luisa A. & Aime L. Burns. (2003). Wound Healing. Humana Press eBooks. 22 indexed citations

8.

Burns, Aime L., et al.. (2002). The Effect of Sepsis on Wound Healing. Journal of Surgical Research. 102(2). 193–197. 44 indexed citations

9.

Swift, Mari E., et al.. (2001). Age-Related Alterations in the Inflammatory Response to Dermal Injury. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 117(5). 1027–1035. 273 indexed citations

10.

Burns, Aime L., Deanna L. Benson, Marthe J. Howard, & Joseph F. Margiotta. (1997). Chick Ciliary Ganglion Neurons Contain Transcripts Coding for Acetylcholine Receptor-Associated Protein at Synapses (Rapsyn). Journal of Neuroscience. 17(13). 5016–5026. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact