Agneta Berg

55 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Agneta Berg
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Research and Theory 72
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 33
  • Applied Psychology 134
  • Leadership and Management 30
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 115
Replace Gianluca Catania with:
Gianluca Catania Italy
May Solveig Fagermoen Norway
Ella Danielson Sweden
Abbas Abbaszadeh Iran
Ellen Rukholm Canada
Maria Arman Sweden
Linda M. Sawyer United States
Rose Chapman Australia
Åshild Slettebø Norway
Giuseppe Aleo Italy
Agneta Berg relative to Gianluca Catania Italy Gianluca Catania's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.9×
Gianluca Catania · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Agneta Berg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Agneta Berg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Agneta Berg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Agneta Berg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Agneta Berg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Agneta Berg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Agneta Berg. The network helps show where Agneta Berg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Agneta Berg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Agneta Berg Line = papers co-authored together Agneta Berg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994140
2 2005117
3 199988
4 200182
5 200373
6 200863
7 199857
8 201046
9 201543
10 200342
11 201640
12 201040
13 201139
14 201437
15 200037
16 200936
17 200833
18 201030
19 200730
20 200728

About Agneta Berg

Agneta Berg is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Speech and Hearing, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include School Health and Nursing Education (6 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (6 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (5 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers), Ethics in medical practice (4 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (4 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (72 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (33 citations), Applied Psychology (134 citations), Leadership and Management (30 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (115 citations). Agneta Berg has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Finland and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Ingalill Rahm Hallberg, Eva Benzein, Eva K. Clausson, Elisabeth Severinsson, Riitta Suhonen, Ewa Idvall, Jouko Katajisto, Chryssoula Lemonidou, Pernilla Garmy and Anneli Sarvimäki. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Nursing Studies, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Nursing Management, Nursing Ethics and Journal of Clinical Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact