Agneta Berg

2.1k total citations
58 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Agneta Berg is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Agneta Berg has authored 58 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in General Health Professions, 14 papers in Clinical Psychology and 14 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Agneta Berg's work include School Health and Nursing Education (9 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (9 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (8 papers). Agneta Berg is often cited by papers focused on School Health and Nursing Education (9 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (9 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (8 papers). Agneta Berg collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Finland and Greece. Agneta Berg's co-authors include Ingalill Rahm Hallberg, Eva Benzein, Eva K. Clausson, Elisabeth Severinsson, Riitta Suhonen, Ewa Idvall, Jouko Katajisto, Chryssoula Lemonidou, Pernilla Garmy and Anneli Sarvimäki and has published in prestigious journals such as BMC Public Health, Journal of Advanced Nursing and European Radiology.

In The Last Decade

Agneta Berg

55 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Agneta Berg Sweden 25 815 369 345 216 175 58 1.6k
May Solveig Fagermoen Norway 25 627 0.8× 299 0.8× 333 1.0× 135 0.6× 303 1.7× 59 1.6k
Gunilla Strandberg Sweden 26 991 1.2× 417 1.1× 514 1.5× 186 0.9× 102 0.6× 56 1.7k
Hamid Peyrovi Iran 24 493 0.6× 324 0.9× 493 1.4× 217 1.0× 214 1.2× 120 1.7k
Caitlin N. Dorsey United States 13 1.2k 1.5× 356 1.0× 338 1.0× 145 0.7× 163 0.9× 25 2.0k
Maria Arman Sweden 23 589 0.7× 425 1.2× 382 1.1× 120 0.6× 285 1.6× 77 1.6k
Ann Rudman Sweden 27 1.4k 1.7× 480 1.3× 683 2.0× 265 1.2× 263 1.5× 62 2.4k
Naiemeh Seyedfatemi Iran 20 438 0.5× 330 0.9× 608 1.8× 216 1.0× 190 1.1× 136 1.3k
Karen‐Leigh Edward Australia 26 854 1.0× 359 1.0× 841 2.4× 409 1.9× 162 0.9× 111 2.4k
Holly Wei United States 25 1.2k 1.5× 313 0.8× 844 2.4× 164 0.8× 182 1.0× 65 2.2k
Jette Ammentorp Denmark 27 1.0k 1.3× 680 1.8× 250 0.7× 136 0.6× 362 2.1× 109 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Agneta Berg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Agneta Berg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Agneta Berg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Agneta Berg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Agneta Berg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Agneta Berg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Agneta Berg. The network helps show where Agneta Berg may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Agneta Berg

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Agneta Berg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Agneta Berg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Agneta Berg. Agneta Berg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Suhonen, Riitta, Minna Stolt, Agneta Berg, et al.. (2017). Cancer patients' perceptions of quality‐of‐care attributes—Associations with age, perceived health status, gender and education. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 27(1-2). 306–316. 18 indexed citations
3.
Charalambous, Andreas, Laurel E. Radwin, Agneta Berg, et al.. (2016). An international study of hospitalized cancer patients’ health status, nursing care quality, perceived individuality in care and trust in nurses: A path analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 61. 176–186. 40 indexed citations
4.
Garmy, Pernilla, Agneta Berg, & Eva K. Clausson. (2015). A qualitative study exploring adolescents’ experiences with a school-based mental health program. BMC Public Health. 15(1). 1074–1074. 41 indexed citations
5.
Idvall, Ewa, Agneta Berg, Jouko Katajisto, et al.. (2012). Nurses’ Sociodemographic Background and Assessments of Individualized Care. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 44(3). 284–293. 28 indexed citations
6.
Papastavrou, Evridiki, Georgios Efstathiou, Rengin Acaroğlu, et al.. (2011). A seven country comparison of nurses’ perceptions of their professional practice environment. Journal of Nursing Management. 20(2). 236–248. 24 indexed citations
7.
Suhonen, Riitta, Agneta Berg, Ewa Idvall, et al.. (2010). Adapting the Individualized Care Scale for cross‐cultural comparison. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. 24(2). 392–403. 30 indexed citations
8.
Suhonen, Riitta, Lucy Land, Maritta Välimäki, et al.. (2010). Impact of patient characteristics on orthopaedic and trauma patients' perceptions of individualised nursing care. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare. 8(4). 259–267. 22 indexed citations
9.
Severinsson, Elisabeth, et al.. (2009). Nurses’ moral strength: a hermeneutic inquiry in nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 65(9). 1882–1890. 36 indexed citations
10.
Suhonen, Riitta, Agneta Berg, Ewa Idvall, et al.. (2008). Individualised care from the orthopaedic and trauma patients’ perspective: An international comparative survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 45(11). 1586–1597. 33 indexed citations
11.
Berg, Agneta, et al.. (2007). Are supervisors using theoretical perspectives in their work? A descriptive survey among Swedish-approved clinical supervisors. Journal of Nursing Management. 15(8). 853–861. 7 indexed citations
12.
Berg, Agneta, Riitta Suhonen, & Ewa Idvall. (2007). A survey of orthopaedic patients’ assessment of care using the Individualised Care Scale. Journal of Orthopaedic Nursing. 11(3-4). 185–193. 18 indexed citations
13.
Sarvimäki, Anneli, et al.. (2007). Health promotion and empowerment from the perspective of individuals living with head and neck cancer. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 12(1). 26–34. 30 indexed citations
14.
Clausson, Eva K., Lennart Köhler, & Agneta Berg. (2007). Ethical Challenges for School Nurses in Documenting Schoolchildren's Health. Nursing Ethics. 15(1). 40–51. 11 indexed citations
15.
Benzein, Eva & Agneta Berg. (2003). The Swedish version of Herth Hope Index – an instrument for palliative care. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. 17(4). 409–415. 72 indexed citations
16.
Clausson, Eva K., Kerstin Petersson, & Agneta Berg. (2003). School nurses’ view of schoolchildren's health and their attitudes to document it in the school health record – a pilot study. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. 17(4). 392–398. 42 indexed citations
17.
Berg, Agneta, et al.. (2000). Dementia care nurses' experiences of systematic clinical group supervision and supervised planned nursing care. Journal of Nursing Management. 8(6). 357–368. 26 indexed citations
18.
Berg, Agneta & Ingalill Rahm Hallberg. (2000). Psychiatric nurses' lived experiences of working with inpatient care on a general team psychiatric ward. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. 7(4). 323–333. 37 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026