Agnese Sampietro
- Human-Computer Interaction top 2%
- Communication top 5%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Language and Linguistics top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Topics
- Digital Communication and Language (13 papers)Social Media and Politics (8 papers)Cultural and political discourse analysis (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaComputers & EducationJournal of Pragmatics
In The Last Decade
Agnese Sampietro
18 papers receiving 316 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Human-Computer Interaction 153
- Communication 118
- Literature and Literary Theory 86
- Language and Linguistics 73
- Sociology and Political Science 68
Countries citing papers authored by Agnese Sampietro
This map shows the geographic impact of Agnese Sampietro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Agnese Sampietro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Agnese Sampietro more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Agnese Sampietro
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Agnese Sampietro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Agnese Sampietro. The network helps show where Agnese Sampietro may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Agnese Sampietro
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Agnese Sampietro. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Agnese Sampietro based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Agnese Sampietro. Agnese Sampietro is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 34 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 43 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 96 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | El debate ciudadano en redes sociales: ¿libertad o intimidación? | 1 |
| 18 | EMOTICONOS Y MULTIMODALIDAD. EL USO DEL PULGAR HACIA ARRIBA EN WHATSAPP | 19 |
| 19 | Exploring the punctuating effect of emoji in Spanish whatsapp chats | 25 |
| 20 | Aproximación neurolingüística al estudio del bilingüismo | 1 |
About Agnese Sampietro
Agnese Sampietro is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Communication and Linguistics and Language, having authored 22 papers that have together received 331 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Communication and Language (13 papers), Social Media and Politics (8 papers) and Cultural and political discourse analysis (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (153 citations), Communication (118 citations) and Linguistics and Language (43 citations). Agnese Sampietro has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Germany and Argentina. Frequent co-authors include Sebastían Sánchez Castillo, Ladislao Salmerón, Pablo Delgado, Lidia Valera Ordaz and Tomás Baviera. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Computers & Education and Journal of Pragmatics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.