Agnès de Cordoüe
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Rheumatology
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
- Co-authors
- İlknur Tuğal-TutkunAhmet GülDavid GuezCarlos PavésioKim FoxMarie-Dominique FratacciMarc FisherMichael G. Hennerici
- Topics
- Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (4 papers)Retinal and Optic Conditions (2 papers)Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited KingdomTürkiye
In The Last Decade
Agnès de Cordoüe
8 papers receiving 346 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 176
- Ophthalmology 99
- Rheumatology 64
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 61
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 58
Countries citing papers authored by Agnès de Cordoüe
This map shows the geographic impact of Agnès de Cordoüe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Agnès de Cordoüe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Agnès de Cordoüe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Agnès de Cordoüe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Agnès de Cordoüe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Agnès de Cordoüe. The network helps show where Agnès de Cordoüe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Agnès de Cordoüe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Agnès de Cordoüe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Agnès de Cordoüe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Agnès de Cordoüe. Agnès de Cordoüe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 72 | |
| 2 | 48 | |
| 3 | 143 | |
| 4 | 52 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | Traitement de l'hypertension arterielle par l'indapamide 1,5 mg comprime enrobé à libération prolongée: Synthèse des résultats | 9 |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | [Therapeutic benefit of a low dose of indapamide: results of a double-blind against placebo European controlled study]. | 4 |
About Agnès de Cordoüe
Agnès de Cordoüe is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Rheumatology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (4 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (2 papers) and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (99 citations), Internal Medicine (35 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (176 citations). Agnès de Cordoüe has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include İlknur Tuğal-Tutkun, Ahmet Gül, David Guez, Carlos Pavésio, Kim Fox, Marie-Dominique Fratacci, Marc Fisher, Michael G. Hennerici, Ángel Chamorro and Pierre Amarenco. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, The American Journal of Cardiology and Journal of Hypertension.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.