Afsar Khan
Impact in
- Pharmacology top 0.5%
- Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology
- Biochemistry top 1%
- Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
- Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae
Papers in
-
- Phytochemistry and Biological Activities 53
-
- Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 41
- Phytochemical compounds biological activities 12
- Co-authors
- Guiguang Cheng (40 shared papers)Umar Farooq (32 shared papers)Yaping Liu (35 shared papers)Jianxin Cao (25 shared papers)Shagufta Perveen (17 shared papers)Muhammad Alı Hashmı (8 shared papers)Tianrui Zhao (25 shared papers)Yudan Wang (17 shared papers)
- Journals
- Natural Product Communications (9 papers)Tetrahedron Letters (7 papers)Phytomedicine (7 papers)Fitoterapia (6 papers)Phytochemistry (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- PakistanChinaSaudi Arabia
In The Last Decade
Afsar Khan
159 papers receiving 3.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
- Pharmacology 596
- Biochemistry 408
- Biochemistry 204
- Toxicology 87
- Complementary and alternative medicine 199
Countries citing papers authored by Afsar Khan
This map shows the geographic impact of Afsar Khan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Afsar Khan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Afsar Khan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Afsar Khan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Afsar Khan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Afsar Khan. The network helps show where Afsar Khan may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Afsar Khan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 166 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 205 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 195 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 118 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 101 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 93 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 92 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 79 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 76 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 60 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 49 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 49 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 46 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 45 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 45 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 44 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 42 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 38 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 38 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 37 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 36 |
About Afsar Khan
Afsar Khan is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Biomaterials, having authored 166 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (53 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (41 papers), Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology (25 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (22 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (19 papers), Phytochemistry and Bioactive Compounds (17 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (14 papers) and Phytochemical compounds biological activities (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (596 citations), Biochemistry (408 citations), Biochemistry (204 citations), Toxicology (87 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (199 citations). Afsar Khan has collaborated with scholars based in Pakistan, China and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Guiguang Cheng, Umar Farooq, Yaping Liu, Jianxin Cao, Shagufta Perveen, Muhammad Alı Hashmı, Tianrui Zhao, Yudan Wang, Meilian Yang and Xiao‐Dong Luo. Their work appears in journals such as Natural Product Communications, Tetrahedron Letters, Phytomedicine, Fitoterapia and Phytochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.