Adrian Battye

462 citations
6 papers · 149 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

    • Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation 3
    • Historical Linguistics and Language Studies 3
    • Linguistic research and analysis 1
    • Linguistics and Discourse Analysis 2

Adrian Battye

5 papers receiving 117 citations

Peers

Adrian Battye
Comparison fields: 5 of 15
  • Linguistics and Language 74
  • Language and Linguistics 118
  • Cultural Studies 24
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 33
  • Philosophy 25
Replace Colette G. Craig with:
Colette G. Craig United States
Lars‐Olof Delsing Sweden
Dieter Wanner United States
Oswald Panagl Austria
Yehuda N. Falk Israel
Lobke Ghesquière Belgium
Jan Schroten Netherlands
Willem J. de Reuse United States
Salvador Valera Spain
Ray Cattell
Adrian Battye relative to Colette G. Craig United States Colette G. Craig's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Colette G. Craig · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Adrian Battye

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Adrian Battye's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adrian Battye with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adrian Battye more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Adrian Battye

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adrian Battye. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adrian Battye. The network helps show where Adrian Battye may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Adrian Battye, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Adrian Battye Line = papers co-authored together Adrian Battye links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 1995115
2 199316
3 20038
4
The French language today : a linguistic introduction, 2nd ed
20005
5 19915
6 19920

About Adrian Battye

Adrian Battye is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Philosophy, Linguistics and Language, Cognitive Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 6 papers that have together received 149 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (3 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (3 papers), Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (2 papers), Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies (1 paper), Natural Language Processing Techniques (1 paper), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (1 paper) and Linguistic research and analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (74 citations), Language and Linguistics (118 citations), Cultural Studies (24 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (33 citations) and Philosophy (25 citations). Adrian Battye has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ian Roberts, Douglas A. Kibbee and Paul Rowlett. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Linguistics, Journal of French Language Studies, Modern Language Journal and University of Salford Institutional Repository (University of Salford).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact