Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Intimate Partner Violence and Barriers to Help-Seeking Among Black, Asian, Minority Ethnic and Immigrant Women: A Qualitative Metasynthesis of Global Research
This map shows the geographic impact of Adèle Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adèle Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adèle Jones more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adèle Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adèle Jones. The network helps show where Adèle Jones may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Adèle Jones
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Adèle Jones.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Adèle Jones based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Adèle Jones. Adèle Jones is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jones, Adèle, et al.. (2015). Catching Hell and Doing Well: Black women in the UK – the Abasindi Cooperative. University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield).6 indexed citations
Sharratt, Kathryn, et al.. (2014). Dimensionality and Construct Validity of the Romanian Self-Report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield).3 indexed citations
Sharratt, Kathryn, et al.. (2012). Stakeholder Perspectives on the Needs of Children of Prisoners in Europe. University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield). 5(2). 97–114.2 indexed citations
11.
Jones, Adèle, et al.. (2009). HIV-AIDS and Social Work Practice in the Caribbean. University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield).2 indexed citations
Jones, Adèle. (2008). Comparative perspectives symposium : Gendered migrations a silent but mighty river : The costs of women's economic migration. Signs. 33(4). 761–769.5 indexed citations
15.
Jones, Adèle. (2007). Child-centred methodology: a means to understanding children's experiences of family separation through migration: the case of Trinidad and Tobago. University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield).
16.
Jones, Adèle, et al.. (2004). Children's Experiences of Separation from Parents as a Consequence of Migration. University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield).27 indexed citations
17.
Jones, Adèle. (1998). The child welfare implications of UK immigration and asylum policy. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).4 indexed citations
Jones, Adèle, et al.. (1995). Taking the initiative The report of a national study assessing service provision to black children and families. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).1 indexed citations
20.
Jones, Adèle, et al.. (1992). A home from home The experience of black residential projects as a focus of good practice. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.