Adam Swanger

922 total citations · 1 hit paper
32 papers, 556 citations indexed

About

Adam Swanger is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Astronomy and Astrophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, Adam Swanger has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 556 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 10 papers in Mechanical Engineering and 8 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics. Recurrent topics in Adam Swanger's work include Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies (27 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (7 papers) and Superconducting Materials and Applications (6 papers). Adam Swanger is often cited by papers focused on Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies (27 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (7 papers) and Superconducting Materials and Applications (6 papers). Adam Swanger collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Adam Swanger's co-authors include William Notardonato, James E. Fesmire, Michael L. Johns, Saif Z.S. Al Ghafri, Arman Siahvashi, Eric F. May, Wesley L. Johnson, Kun Peng, Jacob Leachman and Roland Span and has published in prestigious journals such as Energy & Environmental Science, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces and Energies.

In The Last Decade

Adam Swanger

30 papers receiving 528 citations

Hit Papers

Hydrogen liquefaction: a ... 2022 2026 2023 2024 2022 50 100 150 200 250

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Adam Swanger 319 295 212 115 74 32 556
William Notardonato 273 0.9× 245 0.8× 224 1.1× 148 1.3× 71 1.0× 29 562
Shoji Kamiya 199 0.6× 273 0.9× 177 0.8× 96 0.8× 110 1.5× 8 460
Jianpeng Zheng 270 0.8× 202 0.7× 160 0.8× 75 0.7× 32 0.4× 14 422
Arman Siahvashi 293 0.9× 225 0.8× 321 1.5× 169 1.5× 68 0.9× 28 738
L. Decker 233 0.7× 403 1.4× 229 1.1× 186 1.6× 120 1.6× 18 570
U. Cardella 292 0.9× 516 1.7× 308 1.5× 221 1.9× 163 2.2× 9 739
Fuyu Jiao 118 0.4× 169 0.6× 131 0.6× 113 1.0× 65 0.9× 13 380
Thomas Funke 121 0.4× 171 0.6× 123 0.6× 80 0.7× 63 0.9× 5 305
D. O. Dunikov 53 0.2× 151 0.5× 388 1.8× 112 1.0× 77 1.0× 49 603
D. Cecere 276 0.9× 54 0.2× 89 0.4× 41 0.4× 54 0.7× 27 655

Countries citing papers authored by Adam Swanger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Adam Swanger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam Swanger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam Swanger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Adam Swanger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam Swanger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam Swanger. The network helps show where Adam Swanger may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Adam Swanger

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Adam Swanger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Adam Swanger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Adam Swanger. Adam Swanger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Marchetta, Jeffrey, et al.. (2025). Simulations of large-scale zero boiloff, densification, and solidification of hydrogen. Results in Engineering. 25. 104182–104182.
2.
Swanger, Adam, et al.. (2024). Techno-Economic Analysis of Green Hydrogen Energy Storage in a Cryogenic Flux Capacitor. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 1 indexed citations
3.
Swanger, Adam, et al.. (2024). Vacuum Pump-Down of the Annular Insulation Space for Large Field-Erected Liquid Hydrogen Storage Tanks. IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering. 1301(1). 12066–12066. 3 indexed citations
4.
Ghafri, Saif Z.S. Al, U. Cardella, Thomas Funke, et al.. (2022). Hydrogen liquefaction: a review of the fundamental physics, engineering practice and future opportunities. Energy & Environmental Science. 15(7). 2690–2731. 279 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Ghafri, Saif Z.S. Al, et al.. (2022). Modelling of Liquid Hydrogen Boil-Off. Energies. 15(3). 1149–1149. 64 indexed citations
6.
Swanger, Adam, et al.. (2022). Techno-Economic Analysis of a Cryogenic Flux Capacitor for Grid Storage. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 1 indexed citations
7.
Swanger, Adam, et al.. (2022). Passive cooling in Aerogel-Based insulation systems for liquid hydrogen upper stage launch vehicle tanks. Cryogenics. 128. 103591–103591. 6 indexed citations
8.
Swanger, Adam, et al.. (2020). Oxygen storage module with physisorption technology for closed-circuit respirators. IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering. 755(1). 12106–12106.
9.
Rose, Laura J., et al.. (2020). Integrated refrigeration and storage of LNG for compositional stability. IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering. 755(1). 12003–12003. 3 indexed citations
10.
Swanger, Adam & James E. Fesmire. (2020). Cryogenic Flux Capacitor for Advanced Molecular and Energy Storage Applications. IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering. 755(1). 12051–12051. 2 indexed citations
11.
Johnson, Wesley L., et al.. (2018). Comparison of oxygen liquefaction methods for use on the Martian surface. Cryogenics. 90. 60–69. 19 indexed citations
12.
Notardonato, William, et al.. (2017). Final test results for the ground operations demonstration unit for liquid hydrogen. Cryogenics. 88. 147–155. 19 indexed citations
13.
Swanger, Adam, et al.. (2017). Large scale production of densified hydrogen to the triple point and below. IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering. 278. 12013–12013. 14 indexed citations
14.
Notardonato, William, Adam Swanger, Wesley L. Johnson, & Thomas M. Tomsik. (2017). Large Scale Production of Densified Hydrogen to the Triple Point and Below. 53rd AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference. 4 indexed citations
15.
Swanger, Adam, William Notardonato, Wesley L. Johnson, & Thomas M. Tomsik. (2016). Integrated Refrigeration and Storage for Advanced Liquid Hydrogen Operations. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 3 indexed citations
16.
Mantovani, J. G., et al.. (2015). Asteroid Icy Regolith Excavation and Volatile Capture Project. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 1 indexed citations
17.
Notardonato, William, Wesley L. Johnson, Adam Swanger, & Thomas M. Tomsik. (2015). Ground operations demonstration unit for liquid hydrogen initial test results. IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering. 101. 12081–12081. 6 indexed citations
18.
Fesmire, James E., et al.. (2015). Flat-plate boiloff calorimeters for testing of thermal insulation systems. IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering. 101. 12057–12057. 7 indexed citations
19.
Demko, Jonathan, James E. Fesmire, Wesley L. Johnson, & Adam Swanger. (2014). Cryogenic insulation standard data and methodologies. AIP conference proceedings. 463–470. 7 indexed citations
20.
Mantovani, J. G., et al.. (2014). Characterizing the Physical and Thermal Properties of Planetary Regolith at Low Temperatures. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026