Adam Shriver

24 papers receiving 322 citations

Peers

Adam Shriver
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Small Animals 86
  • Business and International Management 8
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 68
  • Genetics 95
  • Pharmacy 13
Replace Megan R. LaFollette with:
Megan R. LaFollette United States
Alison P. Grand United States
Asahi Ogi Italy
Belén Rosado Spain
Pia Lucidi Italy
Kelly D. Cliff United States
Elisabeth Ormandy Canada
Leanne C. Alworth United States
Franck Péron France
James Stevenson United States
Adam Shriver relative to Megan R. LaFollette United States Megan R. LaFollette's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Megan R. LaFollette · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Adam Shriver

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Adam Shriver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam Shriver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam Shriver more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Adam Shriver

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam Shriver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam Shriver. The network helps show where Adam Shriver may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Adam Shriver, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Adam Shriver Line = papers co-authored together Adam Shriver links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201848
2 200942
3 201938
4 201836
5 201929
6 201828
7 201926
8 200617
9 202014
10 20149
11 20208
12 20188
13
Consideration and checkboxes: incorporating ethics and science into the 3Rs.
20158
14 20096
15 20144
16 20184
17 20054
18 20204
19 20193
20 20242

About Adam Shriver

Adam Shriver is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Genetics, Small Animals, Plant Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 343 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Animal Interaction Studies (4 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (4 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (4 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (4 papers), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (3 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers) and Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (86 citations), Business and International Management (8 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (68 citations), Genetics (95 citations) and Pharmacy (13 citations). Adam Shriver has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Murat Aydede, Daniel M. Weary, Jesse Robbins, M.A.G. von Keyserlingk, Andrew Fenton, L. Syd M Johnson, María José Hötzel, John P. Gluck, Jane Johnson and Hope Ferdowsian. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, PLoS ONE, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, Philosophical Psychology and Current topics in behavioral neurosciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact