Adam Robinson
- Materials Chemistry top 5%
- Aerospace Engineering top 1%
- Inorganic Chemistry top 5%
- Mechanical Engineering top 10%
- Radiation top 10%
- Co-authors
- Dennis D. KeiserDaniel M. WachsJian GanJan‐Fong JueBrandon MillerG.L. HofmanYeon Soo KimPavel Medvedev
- Topics
- Nuclear Materials and Properties (61 papers)Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (58 papers)Fusion materials and technologies (27 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth KoreaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Adam Robinson
75 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Materials Chemistry 1.1k
- Aerospace Engineering 837
- Inorganic Chemistry 266
- Mechanical Engineering 166
- Radiation 60
Countries citing papers authored by Adam Robinson
This map shows the geographic impact of Adam Robinson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam Robinson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam Robinson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Adam Robinson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam Robinson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam Robinson. The network helps show where Adam Robinson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Adam Robinson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Adam Robinson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Adam Robinson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Adam Robinson. Adam Robinson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | AFIP-7 Post-irradiation Examination Summary Report | 0 |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 20 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 37 | |
| 12 | 61 | |
| 13 | Summary of Post Irradiation Examination Results of the AFIP-6 Failure | 1 |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 99 | |
| 16 | 30 | |
| 17 | 41 | |
| 18 | US RERTR Fuel Development Post Irradiation Examination Results | 9 |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | What Smart Students Know: Maximum Grades. Optimum Learning. Minimum Time. | 2 |
About Adam Robinson
Adam Robinson is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Inorganic Chemistry, having authored 77 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear Materials and Properties (61 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (58 papers) and Fusion materials and technologies (27 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aerospace Engineering (837 citations), Materials Chemistry (1.1k citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (266 citations). Adam Robinson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Dennis D. Keiser, Daniel M. Wachs, Jian Gan, Jan‐Fong Jue, Brandon Miller, G.L. Hofman, Yeon Soo Kim, Pavel Medvedev, James W. Madden and M. K. Meyer. Their work appears in journals such as Computer, Journal of Nuclear Materials and JOM.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.