Adam Rehak

643 total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 286 citations indexed

About

Adam Rehak is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Adam Rehak has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 286 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, 3 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 3 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Adam Rehak's work include Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (6 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers) and Tracheal and airway disorders (3 papers). Adam Rehak is often cited by papers focused on Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (6 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers) and Tracheal and airway disorders (3 papers). Adam Rehak collaborates with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and Ireland. Adam Rehak's co-authors include A. Higgs, N. Chrimes, Jonathan Gatward, Christopher Groombridge, Steven McGloughlin, Christopher P Nickson, David Brewster, David E. Vokes, Leonie Watterson and A. M. B. Heard and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Anaesthesia, The Medical Journal of Australia and Anaesthesia.

In The Last Decade

Adam Rehak

7 papers receiving 281 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Consensus statement: Safe Airway Society principles of airway management and tracheal intubation specific to the COVID ‐19 adult patient group

2020 240 citations David Brewster, N. Chrimes et al. The Medical Journal of Australia profile →

Peers

Adam Rehak

PRM

APM

ONCOL

EM

CCICM

Gerardo Cortese Italy

N. Chrimes Australia

Sergio Pintaudi Italy

Andrew Shrimpton United Kingdom

Lalit Mehdiratta India

Koon Ngai Lam Hong Kong

Jonathan Chun-Hei Cheung Hong Kong

Joerg Brederlau Germany

Irene Prediletto Italy

Ernesto Contro Italy

Gerardo Cortese Italy

Adam Rehak

134 ×0.7

PRM

67 ×0.5

APM

86 ×1.1

ONCOL

35 ×0.7

EM

41 ×1.0

CCICM

Citations per year, relative to Adam Rehak Adam Rehak (= 1×) peers Gerardo Cortese

Countries citing papers authored by Adam Rehak

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Adam Rehak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam Rehak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam Rehak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Adam Rehak

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam Rehak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam Rehak. The network helps show where Adam Rehak may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Adam Rehak

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Adam Rehak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Adam Rehak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Adam Rehak. Adam Rehak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Zundert, André van, et al.. (2021). 2021 Update on airway management from the Anaesthesia Continuing Education Airway Management Special Interest Group. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. 49(4). 257–267. 1 indexed citations

2.

Chrimes, N., A. Higgs, & Adam Rehak. (2020). Lost in transition: the challenges of getting airway clinicians to move from the upper airway to the neck during an airway crisis. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 125(1). e38–e46. 12 indexed citations

3.

Brewster, David, N. Chrimes, Christopher Groombridge, et al.. (2020). Consensus statement: Safe Airway Society principles of airway management and tracheal intubation specific to the COVID ‐19 adult patient group. The Medical Journal of Australia. 212(10). 472–481. 240 indexed citations breakdown →

4.

Rehak, Adam & Leonie Watterson. (2019). Institutional preparedness to prevent and manage anaesthesia‐related ‘can't intubate, can't oxygenate’ events in Australian and New Zealand teaching hospitals. Anaesthesia. 75(6). 767–774. 13 indexed citations

5.

D’Souza, Richard, et al.. (2018). The Establishment of An Anaesthetist-Managed Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Service and Initial Outcome Data. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. 46(1). 74–78. 3 indexed citations

6.

Rehak, Adam, et al.. (2016). A cadaver study comparing three fibreoptic‐assisted techniques for converting a supraglottic airway to a cuffed tracheal tube. Anaesthesia. 72(2). 223–229. 6 indexed citations

7.

Watterson, Leonie, Adam Rehak, A. M. B. Heard, & Stuart Marshall. (2014). Transition from supraglottic to infraglottic rescue in the “can’t intubate can’t oxygenate”(CICO) scenario. Monash University Research Portal (Monash University). 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact