Adam M. Miller
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Cell Biology
- Co-authors
- David M. SmithLindsey C. VedderL. Matthew LawMarc HarrisonWilliam MauPaul A. KnepperMichael NolanJohn Y. Choi
- Topics
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms (11 papers)Glaucoma and retinal disorders (6 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers)
- Journals
- NeuronCurrent BiologyCerebral Cortex
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaGuatemala
In The Last Decade
Adam M. Miller
33 papers receiving 713 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
- Cognitive Neuroscience 333
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 198
- Molecular Biology 134
- Ophthalmology 90
- Cell Biology 63
Countries citing papers authored by Adam M. Miller
This map shows the geographic impact of Adam M. Miller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam M. Miller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam M. Miller more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Adam M. Miller
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam M. Miller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam M. Miller. The network helps show where Adam M. Miller may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Adam M. Miller
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Adam M. Miller. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Adam M. Miller based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Adam M. Miller. Adam M. Miller is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 57 | |
| 9 | 18 | |
| 10 | 80 | |
| 11 | 137 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 34 | |
| 14 | 27 | |
| 15 | 24 | |
| 16 | 24 | |
| 17 | 68 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | Non-Penetrating Deep Sclerectomy with Mitomycin C and Trabeculectomy with Mitomycin C: A Comparison of Efficacy and Complications | 1 |
| 20 | A Criterion System For Measuring Outcomes Of Counseling. | 2 |
About Adam M. Miller
Adam M. Miller is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Sensory Systems, having authored 34 papers that have together received 741 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory and Neural Mechanisms (11 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (6 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (333 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (198 citations) and Ophthalmology (90 citations). Adam M. Miller has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Guatemala. Frequent co-authors include David M. Smith, Lindsey C. Vedder, L. Matthew Law, Marc Harrison, William Mau, Paul A. Knepper, Michael Nolan, John Y. Choi, Wanda Fremont and Wendy R. Kates. Their work appears in journals such as Neuron, Current Biology and Cerebral Cortex.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.