Adam King

1.4k total citations
28 papers, 630 citations indexed

About

Adam King is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, Adam King has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 630 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Surgery, 12 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 4 papers in Communication. Recurrent topics in Adam King's work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (12 papers), Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (9 papers) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (6 papers). Adam King is often cited by papers focused on Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (12 papers), Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (9 papers) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (6 papers). Adam King collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Adam King's co-authors include Rob Kling, Geoffrey McKim, Matthew D. McEvoy, Jonathan P. Wanderer, Bret D. Alvis, Timothy M. Geiger, Warren S. Sandberg, Christopher L. Wu, Matthew D. Spann and Michael C. Grant and has published in prestigious journals such as Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Anesthesia & Analgesia and Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.

In The Last Decade

Adam King

28 papers receiving 586 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Adam King United States 13 306 197 108 85 72 28 630
Veronica Ka Wai Lai Hong Kong 12 126 0.4× 165 0.8× 73 0.7× 166 2.0× 11 0.2× 36 744
David Pace Canada 16 204 0.7× 84 0.4× 20 0.2× 162 1.9× 16 0.2× 65 1.1k
Jeremy Albright United States 13 169 0.6× 70 0.4× 20 0.2× 71 0.8× 41 0.6× 34 536
Jorge Rodríguez Spain 13 231 0.8× 49 0.2× 42 0.4× 96 1.1× 92 1.3× 44 552
Steven D. Waldman United States 13 297 1.0× 21 0.1× 228 2.1× 87 1.0× 82 1.1× 63 637
Deborah Turner United States 12 94 0.3× 42 0.2× 20 0.2× 18 0.2× 18 0.3× 29 445
Stefan Seiler Switzerland 11 86 0.3× 15 0.1× 199 1.8× 70 0.8× 188 2.6× 26 630
Christine A. Vandebeek Canada 6 112 0.4× 26 0.1× 106 1.0× 67 0.8× 79 1.1× 9 432
Aaron Gazendam Canada 16 439 1.4× 87 0.4× 20 0.2× 65 0.8× 9 0.1× 60 963
Judith Calder United Kingdom 10 48 0.2× 13 0.1× 70 0.6× 73 0.9× 14 0.2× 15 390

Countries citing papers authored by Adam King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Adam King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Adam King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam King. The network helps show where Adam King may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Adam King

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Adam King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Adam King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Adam King. Adam King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kleiman, Norman J., Elijah F. Edmondson, Michael M. Weil, et al.. (2023). Radiation cataract in Heterogeneous Stock mice after γ-ray or HZE ion exposure. Life Sciences in Space Research. 40. 97–105. 4 indexed citations
2.
Hood, Rick, et al.. (2023). Categorising Demand for Child Welfare Services Using Latent Class Analysis: A Study of the National Data-sets on Children in Need in England. The British Journal of Social Work. 53(8). 3704–3724. 3 indexed citations
3.
Dennis, Bradley M., et al.. (2020). Pulmonary Complications After Trauma Pneumonectomy. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 34(7). 1952–1961. 2 indexed citations
4.
Townsend, Wendy M., et al.. (2020). Golden retriever pigmentary uveitis: Challenges of diagnosis and treatment. Veterinary Ophthalmology. 23(5). 774–784. 5 indexed citations
5.
Allen, Brian F.S., Matthew D. McEvoy, Jesse M. Ehrenfeld, et al.. (2019). Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol (ERP) is associated with an increase in the perioperative use of non-opioid multimodal analgesia for non-ERP patients. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 62. 109694–109694. 7 indexed citations
6.
Wu, Christopher L., Adam King, Timothy M. Geiger, et al.. (2019). American Society for Enhanced Recovery and Perioperative Quality Initiative Joint Consensus Statement on Perioperative Opioid Minimization in Opioid-Naïve Patients. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 129(2). 567–577. 87 indexed citations
7.
King, Adam, et al.. (2018). An enhanced recovery program for bariatric surgical patients significantly reduces perioperative opioid consumption and postoperative nausea. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases. 14(6). 849–856. 47 indexed citations
8.
Hawkins, Alexander T., Timothy M. Geiger, Adam King, et al.. (2018). An enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery is associated with decreased organ level rates of complications: a difference-in-differences analysis. Surgical Endoscopy. 33(7). 2222–2230. 8 indexed citations
9.
Kaoutzanis, Christodoulos, Nishant Ganesh Kumar, Dillon C. O’Neill, et al.. (2018). Enhanced Recovery Pathway in Microvascular Autologous Tissue-Based Breast Reconstruction: Should It Become the Standard of Care?. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 141(4). 841–851. 60 indexed citations
11.
Forbes, Rachel C., Beatrice P. Concepcion, & Adam King. (2017). Intraoperative Management of the Kidney Transplant Recipient. Current Transplantation Reports. 4(2). 75–81. 1 indexed citations
12.
King, Adam, Bret D. Alvis, & Matthew D. McEvoy. (2016). Enhanced recovery after surgery, perioperative medicine, and the perioperative surgical home. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 29(6). 727–732. 26 indexed citations
13.
Orena, Eleonora, Adam King, & Christopher G. Hughes. (2016). The role of anesthesia in the prevention of postoperative delirium: a systematic review.. PubMed. 82(6). 669–83. 14 indexed citations
14.
McEvoy, Matthew D., Jonathan P. Wanderer, Adam King, et al.. (2016). A perioperative consult service results in reduction in cost and length of stay for colorectal surgical patients: evidence from a healthcare redesign project. Perioperative Medicine. 5(1). 3–3. 34 indexed citations
15.
King, Adam, Anne E O’Duffy, & Avinash B. Kumar. (2015). Heparin Resistance and Anticoagulation Failure in a Challenging Case of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis. The Neurohospitalist. 6(3). 118–121. 12 indexed citations
16.
Wolfe, Theresa, et al.. (2012). Ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy for urolithiasis in the spinal cord injury population. Spinal Cord. 51(2). 156–160. 14 indexed citations
17.
King, Adam. (2007). Finding Online Subcultures in Shared Meanings. Social Science Computer Review. 26(2). 137–151. 11 indexed citations
18.
King, Adam. (2001). Affective Dimensions of Internet Culture. Social Science Computer Review. 19(4). 414–430. 30 indexed citations
19.
King, Adam & Gary Alan Fine. (2000). Ford on the Line. Journal of Management Inquiry. 9(1). 71–86. 12 indexed citations
20.
King, Adam. (2000). Mapping the Unmappable: Visual Representations of the Internet as Social Constructions. IUScholarWorks (Indiana University). 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026