Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
‘No Ebola…still doomed’ – The Ebola-induced tourism crisis
2018475 citationsMarina Novelli, Adam Jones et al.Annals of Tourism Researchprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Adam Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam Jones more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam Jones. The network helps show where Adam Jones may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Adam Jones
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Adam Jones.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Adam Jones based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Adam Jones. Adam Jones is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jones, Adam, et al.. (2011). An evaluation of the customer satisfaction monitoring system in a decent homes programme. Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository).1 indexed citations
Robins, Nicholas A. & Adam Jones. (2009). Genocides by the Oppressed: Subaltern Genocide in Theory and Practice. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University).8 indexed citations
9.
Jones, Adam, et al.. (2005). An African family archive : the Lawsons of little Popo/Aneho (Togo), 1841-1938. Oxford University Press eBooks.6 indexed citations
Jones, Adam. (2000). Gendercide and Genocide. Medical Entomology and Zoology.63 indexed citations
12.
Jones, Adam. (1990). Aussereuropäische Frauengeschichte : Probleme der Forschung.1 indexed citations
13.
Jones, Adam. (1989). The Earliest German Sources for West African History (1504-1509). Paideuma. 35. 145–154.1 indexed citations
14.
Jones, Adam, et al.. (1989). Sierra Leone Studies at Birmingham, 1985. The International Journal of African Historical Studies. 22(4). 743–743.4 indexed citations
15.
Jones, Adam. (1985). Sources on early sierra leone (22): the visit of a Dutch Fleet in 1625. 15(2). 43–64.1 indexed citations
16.
Jones, Adam, Claire Robertson, & Martin A. Klein. (1985). Women and Slavery in Africa. The International Journal of African Historical Studies. 18(2). 331–331.1 indexed citations
17.
Jones, Adam. (1983). From slaves to palm kernels : a history of the Galinhas country (West Africa), 1730-1890. F. Steiner eBooks. 68(68). 1–220.21 indexed citations
18.
Jones, Adam. (1983). The Kquoja Kingdom: A Forest State in Seventeenth Century West Africa. Paideuma. 29. 23–43.4 indexed citations
Jones, Adam & P. E. H. Hair. (1977). Sources on early Sierra Leone (11): Brun 1624. 7(3). 52–64.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.