Adam Fedorowicz

22 papers receiving 597 citations

Peers

Adam Fedorowicz
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Dermatology 85
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 136
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 54
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 82
  • Spectroscopy 75
Replace Hua Yuan with:
Hua Yuan China
Nina Nikolova Bulgaria
Guanyu Wang China
Valery Tkachenko United States
Kumiko Hayashi Japan
Brad Reisfeld United States
Shodhan Rao India
Andrea Rizzi Italy
Jeffrey A. Cramer United States
Yongna Yuan China
Adam Fedorowicz relative to Hua Yuan China Hua Yuan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Hua Yuan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Adam Fedorowicz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Adam Fedorowicz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam Fedorowicz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam Fedorowicz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Adam Fedorowicz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam Fedorowicz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam Fedorowicz. The network helps show where Adam Fedorowicz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Adam Fedorowicz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Adam Fedorowicz Line = papers co-authored together Adam Fedorowicz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003124
2 200796
3 200690
4 200548
5 200437
6 200535
7 201434
8 200524
9 200322
10 200119
11 201418
12 199816
13 200914
14 200713
15 201511
16 20088
17 20075
18 20014
19
Immunological activity of new heterocyclic amides of 5-amino-3-methylisoxazole-4-carboxylic acid.
19993
20 20033

About Adam Fedorowicz

Adam Fedorowicz is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Dermatology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 22 papers that have together received 628 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (6 papers), Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (5 papers), Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (4 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (4 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (3 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (3 papers), Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (3 papers) and Protein Structure and Dynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (85 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (136 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (54 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (82 citations) and Spectroscopy (75 citations). Adam Fedorowicz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Poland and Peru. Frequent co-authors include Harshinder Singh, Eugene Demchuk, V. Hnizdo, Neeraj Misra, Sidney C. Soderholm, Eva Darian, Leon Butterworth, Stacey E. Anderson, B. Jean Meade and Albert E. Munson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Computational Chemistry, Toxicological Sciences, SAR and QSAR in environmental research, International Journal of Molecular Sciences and Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact