Adam Driks
- Genetics top 0.5%
- Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology 53
- Biotechnology top 0.5%
- Ecology top 0.5%
- Bacteriophages and microbial interactions 52
- Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology 8
- Molecular Biology top 2%
- Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research 20
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 10
- Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing 10
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 9
- Endocrinology top 2%
-
- Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis 12
- Co-authors
- Richard LosickPatrick EichenbergerPeter T. McKenneyAxel G. StöverPeter SetlowBarbara SetlowKatherine L. KnightMadan Paidhungat
- Cited by
- GeneticsBiotechnologyEcology
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyJapan
In The Last Decade
Adam Driks
83 papers receiving 6.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
- Genetics 2.7k
- Biotechnology 824
- Ecology 2.4k
- Molecular Biology 3.6k
- Endocrinology 210
Countries citing papers authored by Adam Driks
This map shows the geographic impact of Adam Driks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam Driks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam Driks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Adam Driks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam Driks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam Driks. The network helps show where Adam Driks may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Adam Driks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 98 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 131 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 7 | The Bacillus subtilis endospore: assembly and functions of the multilayered coatbreakdown → | 2012 | 440 |
| 8 | 2010 | 32 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 116 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 54 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 48 | |
| 12 | 2006 | 36 | |
| 13 | 2004 | 289 | |
| 14 | 2002 | 91 | |
| 15 | 2002 | 167 | |
| 16 | 2000 | 10 | |
| 17 | 2000 | 51 | |
| 18 | 1993 | 85 | |
| 19 | 1991 | 10 | |
| 20 | 1990 | 40 |
About Adam Driks
Adam Driks is a scholar working on Ecology, Genetics and Molecular Biology, having authored 83 papers that have together received 6.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (53 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (52 papers), Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research (20 papers), Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (12 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (10 papers), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (10 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (9 papers) and Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (2.7k citations), Biotechnology (824 citations) and Ecology (2.4k citations). Adam Driks has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Richard Losick, Patrick Eichenberger, Peter T. McKenney, Axel G. Stöver, Peter Setlow, Barbara Setlow, Katherine L. Knight, Madan Paidhungat, Özgür Şahin and Peter S. Margolis. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Cell and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.