Adam Boessen
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Transportation top 5%
- Health top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- John R. HippRobert FarisNicholas N. NagleCarter T. ButtsEmily J. SmithAlyssa W. ChamberlainJames C. WoZack W. Almquist
- Topics
- Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (16 papers)Crime Patterns and Interventions (15 papers)Homelessness and Social Issues (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Adam Boessen
20 papers receiving 754 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Sociology and Political Science 591
- General Health Professions 200
- Transportation 159
- Health 83
- Epidemiology 63
Countries citing papers authored by Adam Boessen
This map shows the geographic impact of Adam Boessen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam Boessen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam Boessen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Adam Boessen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam Boessen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam Boessen. The network helps show where Adam Boessen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Adam Boessen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Adam Boessen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Adam Boessen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Adam Boessen. Adam Boessen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 50 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 38 | |
| 8 | 58 | |
| 9 | 47 | |
| 10 | 23 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 158 | |
| 13 | 38 | |
| 14 | Geographic space and time: The consequences of the spatial footprint for neighborhood crime | 8 |
| 15 | 147 | |
| 16 | Extrapolative Simulation of Neighborhood Networks based on Population Spatial Distribution: Do they Predict Crime? - eScholarship | 1 |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 24 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | 100 |
About Adam Boessen
Adam Boessen is a scholar working on Transportation, Sociology and Political Science and General Health Professions, having authored 21 papers that have together received 775 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (16 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (15 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transportation (159 citations), Sociology and Political Science (591 citations) and Health (83 citations). Adam Boessen has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John R. Hipp, Robert Faris, Nicholas N. Nagle, Carter T. Butts, Emily J. Smith, Alyssa W. Chamberlain, James C. Wo, Zack W. Almquist, Christopher Steven Marcum and Elizabeth Cauffman. Their work appears in journals such as Criminology, The Journals of Gerontology Series B and American Journal of Community Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.