Achim Fieß

998 citations
64 papers · 690 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Achim Fieß

58 papers receiving 681 citations

Peers

Achim Fieß
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Ophthalmology 244
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 547
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 244
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 50
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 193
Replace Nasrin Tehrani with:
Nasrin Tehrani Canada
Jan A. Kylstra United States
Marie Tsaloumas United Kingdom
Sruti S. Akella United States
Angela N. Buffenn United States
D Karagiannis Greece
Tarek Soliman Egypt
Lena Masri United States
Achim Fieß relative to Nasrin Tehrani Canada Nasrin Tehrani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×25×
Nasrin Tehrani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Achim Fieß

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Achim Fieß's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Achim Fieß with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Achim Fieß more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Achim Fieß

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Achim Fieß. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Achim Fieß. The network helps show where Achim Fieß may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Achim Fieß, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Achim Fieß Line = papers co-authored together Achim Fieß links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201749
2 201740
3 201438
4 201736
5 201831
6 201730
7 201930
8 202027
9 202222
10 202221
11 201719
12 201719
13 202218
14 202218
15 202018
16 201917
17 201617
18 202015
19 202214
20 202214

About Achim Fieß

Achim Fieß is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Ophthalmology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 64 papers that have together received 690 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies (43 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (20 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (17 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (14 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (14 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (11 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (9 papers) and Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (244 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (547 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (244 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (50 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (193 citations). Achim Fieß has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Alexander K. Schuster, Norbert Pfeiffer, Michael S. Urschitz, Jacqueline Bauer, Markus Knuf, Philipp S. Muether, Bernd Kirchhof, Eva Mildenberger, Stefan Nickels and Manfred E. Beutel. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Acta Ophthalmologica, British Journal of Ophthalmology, Journal of Clinical Medicine and Der Ophthalmologe.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact