Abe Miller-Rushing
About
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Abe Miller-Rushing
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Abe Miller-Rushing. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Abe Miller-Rushing based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Abe Miller-Rushing. Abe Miller-Rushing is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Abe Miller-Rushing
3 papers receiving 252 citations
Fields of papers citing papers by Abe Miller-Rushing
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Abe Miller-Rushing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Abe Miller-Rushing. The network helps show where Abe Miller-Rushing may publish in the future.
Countries citing papers authored by Abe Miller-Rushing
This map shows the geographic impact of Abe Miller-Rushing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Abe Miller-Rushing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Abe Miller-Rushing more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.