Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A review of performance enhancement of PCM based latent heat storage system within the context of materials, thermal stability and compatibility
This map shows the geographic impact of Abdul Ghafoor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Abdul Ghafoor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Abdul Ghafoor more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Abdul Ghafoor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Abdul Ghafoor. The network helps show where Abdul Ghafoor may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Abdul Ghafoor
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Abdul Ghafoor.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Abdul Ghafoor based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Abdul Ghafoor. Abdul Ghafoor is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
White, Jonathan M., et al.. (2019). Biologically active scaffolds: Synthesis, characterization and studies of oxino bis-pyrazoles by environmental friendly method.. PubMed. 32(2 (Supplementary)). 831–837.1 indexed citations
Munir, Anjum, et al.. (2014). PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A BIOMASS BOILER ON THE BASIS OF HEAT LOSS METHOD AND TOTAL HEAT VALUES OF STEAM. The Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 51(1). 209–215.2 indexed citations
14.
Ghafoor, Abdul, et al.. (2014). Hedonic Price Estimation for Seed Cotton: A Case Study of District Khanewal, Pakistan. 22. 67–75.2 indexed citations
15.
Ghafoor, Abdul, et al.. (2012). Frequency of carcinoma gallbladder in cases of cholelithiasis undergoing cholecystectomy at tertiary care hospital. Rawal Medical Journal. 37(4). 406–408.5 indexed citations
16.
Ghafoor, Abdul, et al.. (2012). Impact of temperature and relative humidity on population abundance of predatory spiders in cotton fields.. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences. 22(3). 649–652.2 indexed citations
17.
Ghafoor, Abdul, et al.. (2011). Population dynamics of the araneid fauna from district Gujranwala, Pakistan.. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences. 21(4). 812–816.11 indexed citations
18.
Ghafoor, Abdul, et al.. (2011). PREDATORY POTENTIAL OF CRYPTOLAEMUS MONTROUZIERI FOR COTTON MEALYBUG UNDER LABORATORY CONDITIONS. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences. 21(1). 90–93.7 indexed citations
19.
Ghafoor, Abdul & Vedat Yorucu. (2002). Public Expenditure and Productivity Puzzle: The Case of Northern Cyprus. OpenMETU (Middle East Technical University). 29(1). 69–85.4 indexed citations
20.
Ghafoor, Abdul, et al.. (2000). Growth response of onion seedlings against various durations of weed competition sown by different planting methods.. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture. 16(5). 489–495.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.