Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Specific root length as an indicator of environmental change
2007525 citationsIvika Ostonen, Ülle Püttsepp et al.Plant Biosystems - An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of A.A. Pronk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A.A. Pronk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A.A. Pronk more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A.A. Pronk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A.A. Pronk. The network helps show where A.A. Pronk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A.A. Pronk
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A.A. Pronk.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A.A. Pronk based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A.A. Pronk. A.A. Pronk is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Pronk, A.A., et al.. (2017). Economics and agronomics of Atlantic and Granola potato production in the dry season 2014 in West Java. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.1 indexed citations
8.
Pronk, A.A., et al.. (2017). Effect of selection methods on seed potato quality. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.3 indexed citations
9.
Bijttebier, Jo, Greet Ruysschaert, Fleur Marchand, et al.. (2014). Assessing farmers’ intention to adopt soil conservation practices across Europe. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 1894–1902.2 indexed citations
Ostonen, Ivika, Ülle Püttsepp, C. Biel, et al.. (2007). Specific root length as an indicator of environmental change. Plant Biosystems - An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology. 141(3). 426–442.525 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Pronk, A.A. & H. van Reuler. (2007). Restoring degraded soils within the Dutch nutrient management legislation for ornamental crop production. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.1 indexed citations
Pronk, A.A., et al.. (2006). Bemesten binnen nieuwe mestwetgeving kán. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 19(21). 8–9.
17.
Ruijter, F.J. de, et al.. (2005). Onderbouwing N-gebruiksnormen akker- en tuinbouw. N-gebruiksnormen 'kleine gewassen'. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.
18.
Pronk, A.A., et al.. (2003). Vóór organische bemesting doel kiezen. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 2003(50). 42–43.
Booij, R., W. van Dijk, A.L. Smit, et al.. (2001). Detaillering projectplan 'Telen met toekomst'. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.