Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Assessment of response to therapy in advanced breast cancer
1977642 citationsJ.L. Hayward, Paul P. Carbone et al.profile →
Assessment of response to therapy in advanced breast cancer.A project of the programme on clinical oncology of the International Union against Cancer, Geneva, Switzerland
1977572 citationsJ.L. Hayward, Paul P. Carbone et al.Cancerprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of A Segaloff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Segaloff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Segaloff more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A Segaloff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A Segaloff. The network helps show where A Segaloff may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A Segaloff
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A Segaloff.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A Segaloff based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A Segaloff. A Segaloff is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Rohrer, D. C., P. Strong, William L. Duax, & A Segaloff. (1978). 17β-Hydroxy-4,14-androstadien-3-one. Acta Crystallographica Section B. 34(9). 2913–2915.2 indexed citations
6.
Hayward, J.L., Paul P. Carbone, Jean-Claude Heuson, et al.. (1977). Assessment of response to therapy in advanced breast cancer.A project of the programme on clinical oncology of the International Union against Cancer, Geneva, Switzerland. Cancer. 39(3). 1289–1294.572 indexed citations breakdown →
Segaloff, A, et al.. (1966). Steroid hormone formation by the rat ovary. II. Identification of steroids and influence of gonadotrophins on steroids formed in vitro from acetate-1-14C by ovarian tissue transplanted to the spleens of male rats for 120 days.. PubMed. 51(1). 131–9.2 indexed citations
Segaloff, A, et al.. (1957). Transient depilatory reaction and other untoward effects of desacetylmethylcolchicine.. PubMed. 3(1). 21–3.2 indexed citations
Segaloff, A, et al.. (1955). Differential diagnosis of adrenal lesions by the use of the intravenous administration of hydrocortisone.. PubMed. 45(2). 219–27.5 indexed citations
19.
Dunning, W. F., M. R. Curtis, & A Segaloff. (1953). Strain differences in response to estrone and the induction of mammary gland, adrenal, and bladder cancer in rats.. PubMed. 13(2). 147–52.34 indexed citations
20.
Segaloff, A, et al.. (1951). The effect of desoxycorticosterone and propylene glycol in experimental hypertension.. PubMed. 37(4). 499–505.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.