А С Аведисова
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Biological Psychiatry top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ferenc MartényiSergey MosolovLu ZhangSmulevich AbDarryle D. SchoeppMorozova MaВ А ТочиловA M Reznik
- Topics
- Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (13 papers)Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (10 papers)Tryptophan and brain disorders (9 papers)
In The Last Decade
А С Аведисова
36 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 597
- Molecular Biology 421
- Psychiatry and Mental health 274
- Biological Psychiatry 185
- Cognitive Neuroscience 168
Countries citing papers authored by А С Аведисова
This map shows the geographic impact of А С Аведисова's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by А С Аведисова with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites А С Аведисова more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by А С Аведисова
This network shows the impact of papers produced by А С Аведисова. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by А С Аведисова. The network helps show where А С Аведисова may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of А С Аведисова
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of А С Аведисова. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of А С Аведисова based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with А С Аведисова. А С Аведисова is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 25 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 41 | |
| 18 | 49 | |
| 19 | [Evolution of the concept of mixed states in bipolar disorder]. | 0 |
| 20 | Activation of mGlu2/3 receptors as a new approach to treat schizophrenia: a randomized Phase 2 clinical trialbreakdown → | 790 |
About А С Аведисова
А С Аведисова is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Psychiatry and Mental health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (13 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (10 papers) and Tryptophan and brain disorders (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (185 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (597 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (274 citations). А С Аведисова has collaborated with scholars based in Russia, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include Ferenc Martényi, Sergey Mosolov, Lu Zhang, Smulevich Ab, Darryle D. Schoepp, Morozova Ma, В А Точилов, A M Reznik, Kimberley Jackson and Bryan G. Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Medicine, Journal of Affective Disorders and The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.