A. R. Dean
- Atmospheric Science top 10%
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Earth-Surface Processes top 10%
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
- Environmental Engineering
- Co-authors
- Phil RosenbergJ. R. DorseyA. MinikinJonathan CrosierJames B. McQuaidAndreas PetzoldP. I. WilliamsRichard Washington
- Topics
- Atmospheric aerosols and clouds (6 papers)Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (4 papers)Aeolian processes and effects (3 papers)
- Journals
- Atmospheric chemistry and physicsJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresAtmospheric measurement techniques
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwitzerlandSweden
In The Last Decade
A. R. Dean
6 papers receiving 292 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
- Atmospheric Science 265
- Global and Planetary Change 261
- Earth-Surface Processes 90
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 48
- Environmental Engineering 20
Countries citing papers authored by A. R. Dean
This map shows the geographic impact of A. R. Dean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. R. Dean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. R. Dean more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by A. R. Dean
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. R. Dean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. R. Dean. The network helps show where A. R. Dean may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. R. Dean
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. R. Dean. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. R. Dean based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. R. Dean. A. R. Dean is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Calibration of a Cloud Droplet Probe: A Review | 1 |
| 2 | 38 | |
| 3 | Saharan Airborne Dust Flux Measurements from the Fennec Campaign | 1 |
| 4 | 155 | |
| 5 | 101 | |
| 6 | Intercomparison of Cloud Base Height at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Southern Great Plains Site | 1 |
About A. R. Dean
A. R. Dean is a scholar working on Earth-Surface Processes, Global and Planetary Change and Atmospheric Science, having authored 6 papers that have together received 297 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atmospheric aerosols and clouds (6 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (4 papers) and Aeolian processes and effects (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (265 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (90 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (261 citations). A. R. Dean has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Phil Rosenberg, J. R. Dorsey, A. Minikin, Jonathan Crosier, James B. McQuaid, Andreas Petzold, P. I. Williams, Richard Washington, M. A. Pickering and John H. Marsham. Their work appears in journals such as Atmospheric chemistry and physics, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres and Atmospheric measurement techniques.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.