Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art
20063.6k citationsA. Fernández‐Jiménez, A. Palomo et al.profile →
Alkali-activated fly ashes
19991.9k citationsA. Palomo, María Teresa Blanco‐Varela et al.profile →
New cements for the 21st century: The pursuit of an alternative to Portland cement
20111.3k citationsA. Fernández‐Jiménez, A. Palomo et al.profile →
Advances in understanding alkali-activated materials
This map shows the geographic impact of A. Palomo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Palomo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Palomo more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Palomo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Palomo. The network helps show where A. Palomo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. Palomo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. Palomo.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. Palomo based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A. Palomo. A. Palomo is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
García-Lodeiro, I., Shane Donatello, A. Fernández‐Jiménez, & A. Palomo. (2013). Basic Principles of Hybrid Alkaline Cements. chemistry and materials research. 4. 12–14.10 indexed citations
Palomo, A.. (2011). XIII International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.6 indexed citations
13.
Palomo, A., et al.. (2007). Factors affecting early compressive strength of alkali activated fly ash (OPC-free) concrete. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.13 indexed citations
14.
Palomo, A., A. Fernández‐Jiménez, & M. Criado. (2004). ''Geopolymers": same basic chemistry, different microstructures. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.3 indexed citations
15.
Fernández‐Jiménez, A., et al.. (2003). Hormigones alcalinos-exentos de cemento portland. 18(3). 123–131.2 indexed citations
16.
Fernández‐Jiménez, A. & A. Palomo. (2003). Characterisation of fly ashes. Potential reactivity as alkaline cements☆. Fuel. 82(18). 2259–2265.558 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Puertas, F., María Teresa Blanco‐Varela, A. Palomo, & T. Vázquez. (1998). Behaviour of a new white cement fabricated with raw materials containing CaF2 and CaSO4 . 2H2O. Part 2: Durability and chemical resistance. DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)). 51(2). 94–100.
18.
Puertas, F., María Teresa Blanco‐Varela, A. Palomo, & T. Vázquez. (1997). Behaviour of a new white cement fabricated with raw materials containing CaF2 and CaSO4.2H2O. Part 1: Hydration process. DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)). 50(4). 232–239.5 indexed citations
19.
Palomo, A. & F. P. Glasser. (1992). Chemically-bonded cementitious materials based on metakaolin. 91(4). 107–112.110 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.